The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms
This study describes the extent of which the use of quality formative assessment on lessons of a course involves the students as self-regulated learners. There is an increased interest among educational researchers to observe improvement of student self-regulation on learning. The predominant use of...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Deusto
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Tuning Journal for Higher Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.tuningjournal.org/article/view/1206 |
_version_ | 1819204798514200576 |
---|---|
author | Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel Dreyer Johann Michael |
author_facet | Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel Dreyer Johann Michael |
author_sort | Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study describes the extent of which the use of quality formative assessment on lessons of a course involves the students as self-regulated learners. There is an increased interest among educational researchers to observe improvement of student self-regulation on learning. The predominant use of summative assessment remains a challenge to helping students develop self-regulation skills in learning and assessment. Quality formative assessment includes formative feedback, self-assessment and peer assessment. The study followed a partially mixed sequential research design and applied a quasi-experimental intervention that lasted for six weeks where six educators applied quality formative assessment on lessons of a general psychology course for intervention group students (N=191). The quantitative data were collected by self-regulated learning questionnaire before and after the use of quality formative assessment on lessons. The qualitative data were collected by focus group discussions with the students. The students’ perceptions on self-regulating learning were compared between the intervention (N=191) and the comparison (N=187) group of students. The quantitative analysis used t-test and biserial correlation and proved the presence of statistically significant difference between the two groups in perceiving the self-regulation of learning. Moreover, effect size estimate (Cohen’s d) was used to provide a strong validation on the variation between the two groups for the measure of self-regulating learning. Recommendations were made to promote the use of quality formative assessment aiming at the improvement of student self-regulation on learning and assessment in university classes. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:41:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f9673710a3534762b3683acf8410dcff |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2340-8170 2386-3137 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:41:32Z |
publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
publisher | Universidad de Deusto |
record_format | Article |
series | Tuning Journal for Higher Education |
spelling | doaj.art-f9673710a3534762b3683acf8410dcff2022-12-21T17:59:47ZengUniversidad de DeustoTuning Journal for Higher Education2340-81702386-31372016-11-01419911810.18543/tjhe-4(1)-2016pp99-1181129The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classroomsFisseha Mikre Weldmeskel0Dreyer Johann Michael1Jimma UniversityUniversity of South Africa (UNISA)This study describes the extent of which the use of quality formative assessment on lessons of a course involves the students as self-regulated learners. There is an increased interest among educational researchers to observe improvement of student self-regulation on learning. The predominant use of summative assessment remains a challenge to helping students develop self-regulation skills in learning and assessment. Quality formative assessment includes formative feedback, self-assessment and peer assessment. The study followed a partially mixed sequential research design and applied a quasi-experimental intervention that lasted for six weeks where six educators applied quality formative assessment on lessons of a general psychology course for intervention group students (N=191). The quantitative data were collected by self-regulated learning questionnaire before and after the use of quality formative assessment on lessons. The qualitative data were collected by focus group discussions with the students. The students’ perceptions on self-regulating learning were compared between the intervention (N=191) and the comparison (N=187) group of students. The quantitative analysis used t-test and biserial correlation and proved the presence of statistically significant difference between the two groups in perceiving the self-regulation of learning. Moreover, effect size estimate (Cohen’s d) was used to provide a strong validation on the variation between the two groups for the measure of self-regulating learning. Recommendations were made to promote the use of quality formative assessment aiming at the improvement of student self-regulation on learning and assessment in university classes.http://www.tuningjournal.org/article/view/1206self-regulated learningquality formative assessmentfeedbackself-assessmentpeer assessmentconstructivist learning |
spellingShingle | Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel Dreyer Johann Michael The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms Tuning Journal for Higher Education self-regulated learning quality formative assessment feedback self-assessment peer assessment constructivist learning |
title | The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms |
title_full | The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms |
title_fullStr | The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms |
title_short | The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms |
title_sort | impact of formative assessment on self regulating learning in university classrooms |
topic | self-regulated learning quality formative assessment feedback self-assessment peer assessment constructivist learning |
url | http://www.tuningjournal.org/article/view/1206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fissehamikreweldmeskel theimpactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms AT dreyerjohannmichael theimpactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms AT fissehamikreweldmeskel impactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms AT dreyerjohannmichael impactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms |