The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms

This study describes the extent of which the use of quality formative assessment on lessons of a course involves the students as self-regulated learners. There is an increased interest among educational researchers to observe improvement of student self-regulation on learning. The predominant use of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel, Dreyer Johann Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Deusto 2016-11-01
Series:Tuning Journal for Higher Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tuningjournal.org/article/view/1206
_version_ 1819204798514200576
author Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel
Dreyer Johann Michael
author_facet Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel
Dreyer Johann Michael
author_sort Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel
collection DOAJ
description This study describes the extent of which the use of quality formative assessment on lessons of a course involves the students as self-regulated learners. There is an increased interest among educational researchers to observe improvement of student self-regulation on learning. The predominant use of summative assessment remains a challenge to helping students develop self-regulation skills in learning and assessment. Quality formative assessment includes formative feedback, self-assessment and peer assessment. The study followed a partially mixed sequential research design and applied a quasi-experimental intervention that lasted for six weeks where six educators applied quality formative assessment on lessons of a general psychology course for intervention group students (N=191). The quantitative data were collected by self-regulated learning questionnaire before and after the use of quality formative assessment on lessons. The qualitative data were collected by focus group discussions with the students. The students’ perceptions on self-regulating learning were compared between the intervention (N=191) and the comparison (N=187) group of students. The quantitative analysis used t-test and biserial correlation and proved the presence of statistically significant difference between the two groups in perceiving the self-regulation of learning. Moreover, effect size estimate (Cohen’s d) was used to provide a strong validation on the variation between the two groups for the measure of self-regulating learning. Recommendations were made to promote the use of quality formative assessment aiming at the improvement of student self-regulation on learning and assessment in university classes.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T04:41:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f9673710a3534762b3683acf8410dcff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2340-8170
2386-3137
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T04:41:32Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Universidad de Deusto
record_format Article
series Tuning Journal for Higher Education
spelling doaj.art-f9673710a3534762b3683acf8410dcff2022-12-21T17:59:47ZengUniversidad de DeustoTuning Journal for Higher Education2340-81702386-31372016-11-01419911810.18543/tjhe-4(1)-2016pp99-1181129The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classroomsFisseha Mikre Weldmeskel0Dreyer Johann Michael1Jimma UniversityUniversity of South Africa (UNISA)This study describes the extent of which the use of quality formative assessment on lessons of a course involves the students as self-regulated learners. There is an increased interest among educational researchers to observe improvement of student self-regulation on learning. The predominant use of summative assessment remains a challenge to helping students develop self-regulation skills in learning and assessment. Quality formative assessment includes formative feedback, self-assessment and peer assessment. The study followed a partially mixed sequential research design and applied a quasi-experimental intervention that lasted for six weeks where six educators applied quality formative assessment on lessons of a general psychology course for intervention group students (N=191). The quantitative data were collected by self-regulated learning questionnaire before and after the use of quality formative assessment on lessons. The qualitative data were collected by focus group discussions with the students. The students’ perceptions on self-regulating learning were compared between the intervention (N=191) and the comparison (N=187) group of students. The quantitative analysis used t-test and biserial correlation and proved the presence of statistically significant difference between the two groups in perceiving the self-regulation of learning. Moreover, effect size estimate (Cohen’s d) was used to provide a strong validation on the variation between the two groups for the measure of self-regulating learning. Recommendations were made to promote the use of quality formative assessment aiming at the improvement of student self-regulation on learning and assessment in university classes.http://www.tuningjournal.org/article/view/1206self-regulated learningquality formative assessmentfeedbackself-assessmentpeer assessmentconstructivist learning
spellingShingle Fisseha Mikre Weldmeskel
Dreyer Johann Michael
The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms
Tuning Journal for Higher Education
self-regulated learning
quality formative assessment
feedback
self-assessment
peer assessment
constructivist learning
title The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms
title_full The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms
title_fullStr The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms
title_full_unstemmed The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms
title_short The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms
title_sort impact of formative assessment on self regulating learning in university classrooms
topic self-regulated learning
quality formative assessment
feedback
self-assessment
peer assessment
constructivist learning
url http://www.tuningjournal.org/article/view/1206
work_keys_str_mv AT fissehamikreweldmeskel theimpactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms
AT dreyerjohannmichael theimpactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms
AT fissehamikreweldmeskel impactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms
AT dreyerjohannmichael impactofformativeassessmentonselfregulatinglearninginuniversityclassrooms