Enthalpies of Combustion and Formation of Severely Crowded Methyl-Substituted 1,3-dioxanes. The Magnitudes of 2,4- and 4,6-diaxial Me,Me-Interactions and the Chair–2,5-twist Energy Difference

Enthalpies of combustion of 2,2-<i>trans</i>-4,6- (<b>1</b>) and 4,4,6,6-tetramethyl- (<b>2</b>) and 2,4,4,6,6- (<b>3</b>) and 2,2,4,4,6-pentamethyl-1,3-dioxanes (<b>4</b>) were determined to estimate their enthalpies of formation in the ga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalevi Pihlaja, Henri Kivelä, Pirjo Vainiotalo, William V. Steele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/12/2762
Description
Summary:Enthalpies of combustion of 2,2-<i>trans</i>-4,6- (<b>1</b>) and 4,4,6,6-tetramethyl- (<b>2</b>) and 2,4,4,6,6- (<b>3</b>) and 2,2,4,4,6-pentamethyl-1,3-dioxanes (<b>4</b>) were determined to estimate their enthalpies of formation in the gas phase. By comparing the latter with the corresponding enthalpies estimated based on the various bond–bond interactions allowed to determine the chair–2,5-twist energy difference (Δ<i>H</i><sub>CT</sub> = 29.8 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup>) for <b>1</b> since C-13 shift correlations indicate that it escapes to the 2,5-twist form where the 2-methyl groups are isoclinal and 4- and 6-methyl groups pseudoequatorial to avoid syn-axial interactions. Compounds <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> in turn give the values 21.0 and 21.6 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup> for the 4,6-diaxial Me,Me-interaction. Finally compound <b>4</b>, which retains the chair conformation to avoid pseudoaxial interactions in the twist forms gives the value 19.5 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup> for the 2,4-diaxial Me,Me-interaction indicating that its chair form appears to be somewhat deformed.
ISSN:1420-3049