Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review
Abstract Aim To map the evidence of the simulation debriefing phase in simulation activities of nursing education, to address and inform clinical teaching and learning in nursing. Design A scoping review. Methods A systematic review of literature published between 2008–2021 was conducted using CINAH...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Nursing Open |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1426 |
| _version_ | 1811166957822541824 |
|---|---|
| author | Liv Fegran Wilma tenHam‐Baloyi Mariann Fossum Olav Johannes Hovland Joanne R. Naidoo Dalena (R.M) vanRooyen Ellen Sejersted Nastasja Robstad |
| author_facet | Liv Fegran Wilma tenHam‐Baloyi Mariann Fossum Olav Johannes Hovland Joanne R. Naidoo Dalena (R.M) vanRooyen Ellen Sejersted Nastasja Robstad |
| author_sort | Liv Fegran |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Aim To map the evidence of the simulation debriefing phase in simulation activities of nursing education, to address and inform clinical teaching and learning in nursing. Design A scoping review. Methods A systematic review of literature published between 2008–2021 was conducted using CINAHL & ERIC, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and JBI Evidence synthesis. Inclusion criteria were primary studies published in English on simulation debriefing at all levels in nursing education. Results Of 140 included references, only 80% (N = 112) framed simulation debriefing theoretically either by specific theories/models or as a literature review of the topic. A variety of simulation debriefing methods were identified; however, debriefing methods were only described in 79% (N = 110) of the references. There appears to be a gap in consensus concerning the theoretical or methodological frameworks characterizing simulation debriefing in nursing education. The majority of studies (86%) were conducted at a bachelor's degree level (N = 121). |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:02:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-fa4a55315c9a48ed8eb2f3b2ac51ae55 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2054-1058 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:02:05Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nursing Open |
| spelling | doaj.art-fa4a55315c9a48ed8eb2f3b2ac51ae552023-02-10T12:27:02ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582023-03-011031217123310.1002/nop2.1426Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping reviewLiv Fegran0Wilma tenHam‐Baloyi1Mariann Fossum2Olav Johannes Hovland3Joanne R. Naidoo4Dalena (R.M) vanRooyen5Ellen Sejersted6Nastasja Robstad7University of Agder, Campus Kristiansand Kristiansand NorwayNelson Mandela University, Ocean Sciences Campus Port Elizabeth South AfricaUniversity of Agder, Campus Grimstad Grimstad NorwayUniversity of Agder, Campus Kristiansand Kristiansand NorwayNelson Mandela University, North Campus Port Elizabeth South AfricaNelson Mandela University, Ocean Sciences Campus Port Elizabeth South AfricaUniversity of Agder, Campus Kristiansand Kristiansand NorwayUniversity of Agder, Campus Kristiansand Kristiansand NorwayAbstract Aim To map the evidence of the simulation debriefing phase in simulation activities of nursing education, to address and inform clinical teaching and learning in nursing. Design A scoping review. Methods A systematic review of literature published between 2008–2021 was conducted using CINAHL & ERIC, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and JBI Evidence synthesis. Inclusion criteria were primary studies published in English on simulation debriefing at all levels in nursing education. Results Of 140 included references, only 80% (N = 112) framed simulation debriefing theoretically either by specific theories/models or as a literature review of the topic. A variety of simulation debriefing methods were identified; however, debriefing methods were only described in 79% (N = 110) of the references. There appears to be a gap in consensus concerning the theoretical or methodological frameworks characterizing simulation debriefing in nursing education. The majority of studies (86%) were conducted at a bachelor's degree level (N = 121).https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1426clinical teaching and learningnursingnursing educationscoping reviewsimulation debriefingtheoretical framework |
| spellingShingle | Liv Fegran Wilma tenHam‐Baloyi Mariann Fossum Olav Johannes Hovland Joanne R. Naidoo Dalena (R.M) vanRooyen Ellen Sejersted Nastasja Robstad Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review Nursing Open clinical teaching and learning nursing nursing education scoping review simulation debriefing theoretical framework |
| title | Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review |
| title_full | Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review |
| title_fullStr | Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review |
| title_short | Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review |
| title_sort | simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education a scoping review |
| topic | clinical teaching and learning nursing nursing education scoping review simulation debriefing theoretical framework |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1426 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT livfegran simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview AT wilmatenhambaloyi simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview AT mariannfossum simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview AT olavjohanneshovland simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview AT joannernaidoo simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview AT dalenarmvanrooyen simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview AT ellensejersted simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview AT nastasjarobstad simulationdebriefingaspartofsimulationforclinicalteachingandlearninginnursingeducationascopingreview |