Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour

Capstone programs are increasing recognised as high-impact value-laden learning experiences for students, especially in aiding the transition of final year students to professional practice. Although these learning programs have a long history in many disciplines, they are a very recent inclusion in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Theunis Roux
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 2014-01-01
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6322
_version_ 1797256751185133568
author Theunis Roux
author_facet Theunis Roux
author_sort Theunis Roux
collection DOAJ
description Capstone programs are increasing recognised as high-impact value-laden learning experiences for students, especially in aiding the transition of final year students to professional practice. Although these learning programs have a long history in many disciplines, they are a very recent inclusion in law curriculum in Australia. This paper reports on a project designed to renew the final year law curriculum in Australia by developing a principled approach to designing capstone programs. This framework is based on six key principles, which are transition, integration and closure, diversity, engagement, assessment, and evaluation. The project also identified two themes underpinning capstone experiences which sit behind the six principles - integration and closure, and transition. The principled approach advocated by the authors’ bridges the gap between curriculum theorising and practice. This paper discusses the theme of transition and how the resources provided in the project Toolkit assist unit coordinators to design effective final year capstone programs. The toolkit outlines the six principles, providing commentary on each, and also offers suggestions for subject models along with examples of actual capstone programs, all of which have been designed to facilitate smooth transitions for final year students as they move from undergraduate to emerging professional.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:26:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-fbf442936f03491c895c276507d66735
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1033-2839
1839-3713
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:26:43Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Bond University
record_format Article
series Legal Education Review
spelling doaj.art-fbf442936f03491c895c276507d667352024-03-20T00:19:25ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132014-01-01241Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological RigourTheunis RouxCapstone programs are increasing recognised as high-impact value-laden learning experiences for students, especially in aiding the transition of final year students to professional practice. Although these learning programs have a long history in many disciplines, they are a very recent inclusion in law curriculum in Australia. This paper reports on a project designed to renew the final year law curriculum in Australia by developing a principled approach to designing capstone programs. This framework is based on six key principles, which are transition, integration and closure, diversity, engagement, assessment, and evaluation. The project also identified two themes underpinning capstone experiences which sit behind the six principles - integration and closure, and transition. The principled approach advocated by the authors’ bridges the gap between curriculum theorising and practice. This paper discusses the theme of transition and how the resources provided in the project Toolkit assist unit coordinators to design effective final year capstone programs. The toolkit outlines the six principles, providing commentary on each, and also offers suggestions for subject models along with examples of actual capstone programs, all of which have been designed to facilitate smooth transitions for final year students as they move from undergraduate to emerging professional.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6322
spellingShingle Theunis Roux
Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour
Legal Education Review
title Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour
title_full Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour
title_fullStr Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour
title_full_unstemmed Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour
title_short Judging the Quality of Legal Research: A Qualified Response to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour
title_sort judging the quality of legal research a qualified response to the demand for greater methodological rigour
url https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6322
work_keys_str_mv AT theunisroux judgingthequalityoflegalresearchaqualifiedresponsetothedemandforgreatermethodologicalrigour