Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor Rehabilitation

Complex motor skills can be acquired while observing a model without physical practice. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) also facilitates motor learning. However, the effectiveness of observational practice for bimanual coordination skills is de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julianne McLeod, Anuj Chavan, Harvey Lee, Sahar Sattari, Simrut Kurry, Miku Wake, Zia Janmohamed, Nicola Jane Hodges, Naznin Virji-Babul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/2/175
_version_ 1797298796214878208
author Julianne McLeod
Anuj Chavan
Harvey Lee
Sahar Sattari
Simrut Kurry
Miku Wake
Zia Janmohamed
Nicola Jane Hodges
Naznin Virji-Babul
author_facet Julianne McLeod
Anuj Chavan
Harvey Lee
Sahar Sattari
Simrut Kurry
Miku Wake
Zia Janmohamed
Nicola Jane Hodges
Naznin Virji-Babul
author_sort Julianne McLeod
collection DOAJ
description Complex motor skills can be acquired while observing a model without physical practice. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) also facilitates motor learning. However, the effectiveness of observational practice for bimanual coordination skills is debated. We compared the behavioural and brain causal connectivity patterns following three interventions: primary motor cortex stimulation (M1-tDCS), action-observation (AO) and a combined group (AO+M1-tDCS) when acquiring a bimanual, two-ball juggling skill. Thirty healthy young adults with no juggling experience were randomly assigned to either video observation of a skilled juggler, anodal M1-tDCS or video observation combined with M1-tDCS. Thirty trials of juggling were performed and scored after the intervention. Resting-state EEG data were collected before and after the intervention. Information flow rate was applied to EEG source data to measure causal connectivity. The two observation groups were more accurate than the tDCS alone group. In the AO condition, there was strong information exchange from (L) parietal to (R) parietal regions, strong bidirectional information exchange between (R) parietal and (R) occipital regions and an extensive network of activity that was (L) lateralized. The M1-tDCS condition was characterized by bilateral long-range connections with the strongest information exchange from the (R) occipital region to the (R) temporal and (L) occipital regions. AO+M1-tDCS induced strong bidirectional information exchange in occipital and temporal regions in both hemispheres. Uniquely, it was the only condition that was characterized by information exchange between the (R) frontal and central regions. This study provides new results about the distinct network dynamics of stimulating the brain for skill acquisition, providing insights for motor rehabilitation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:40:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-feb20ca9a5d647ef86f43ce4e957ab3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:40:14Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-feb20ca9a5d647ef86f43ce4e957ab3c2024-02-23T15:09:48ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252024-02-0114217510.3390/brainsci14020175Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor RehabilitationJulianne McLeod0Anuj Chavan1Harvey Lee2Sahar Sattari3Simrut Kurry4Miku Wake5Zia Janmohamed6Nicola Jane Hodges7Naznin Virji-Babul8Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, CanadaElectronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Sardar Patel Institute of Technology, Mumbai 400058, IndiaSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, CanadaBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B9, CanadaNeuroscience, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, CanadaNeuroscience, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, CanadaNeuroscience, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, CanadaSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, CanadaPhysical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, CanadaComplex motor skills can be acquired while observing a model without physical practice. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) also facilitates motor learning. However, the effectiveness of observational practice for bimanual coordination skills is debated. We compared the behavioural and brain causal connectivity patterns following three interventions: primary motor cortex stimulation (M1-tDCS), action-observation (AO) and a combined group (AO+M1-tDCS) when acquiring a bimanual, two-ball juggling skill. Thirty healthy young adults with no juggling experience were randomly assigned to either video observation of a skilled juggler, anodal M1-tDCS or video observation combined with M1-tDCS. Thirty trials of juggling were performed and scored after the intervention. Resting-state EEG data were collected before and after the intervention. Information flow rate was applied to EEG source data to measure causal connectivity. The two observation groups were more accurate than the tDCS alone group. In the AO condition, there was strong information exchange from (L) parietal to (R) parietal regions, strong bidirectional information exchange between (R) parietal and (R) occipital regions and an extensive network of activity that was (L) lateralized. The M1-tDCS condition was characterized by bilateral long-range connections with the strongest information exchange from the (R) occipital region to the (R) temporal and (L) occipital regions. AO+M1-tDCS induced strong bidirectional information exchange in occipital and temporal regions in both hemispheres. Uniquely, it was the only condition that was characterized by information exchange between the (R) frontal and central regions. This study provides new results about the distinct network dynamics of stimulating the brain for skill acquisition, providing insights for motor rehabilitation.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/2/175transcranial direct-current stimulationeffective connectivityelectroencephalogramaction observationobservational learningmotor skill acquisition
spellingShingle Julianne McLeod
Anuj Chavan
Harvey Lee
Sahar Sattari
Simrut Kurry
Miku Wake
Zia Janmohamed
Nicola Jane Hodges
Naznin Virji-Babul
Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor Rehabilitation
Brain Sciences
transcranial direct-current stimulation
effective connectivity
electroencephalogram
action observation
observational learning
motor skill acquisition
title Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor Rehabilitation
title_full Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor Rehabilitation
title_fullStr Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor Rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor Rehabilitation
title_short Distinct Effects of Brain Activation Using tDCS and Observational Practice: Implications for Motor Rehabilitation
title_sort distinct effects of brain activation using tdcs and observational practice implications for motor rehabilitation
topic transcranial direct-current stimulation
effective connectivity
electroencephalogram
action observation
observational learning
motor skill acquisition
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/14/2/175
work_keys_str_mv AT juliannemcleod distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT anujchavan distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT harveylee distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT saharsattari distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT simrutkurry distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT mikuwake distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT ziajanmohamed distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT nicolajanehodges distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation
AT nazninvirjibabul distincteffectsofbrainactivationusingtdcsandobservationalpracticeimplicationsformotorrehabilitation