Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis
Module analysis for multiple-choice responses (MAMCR) was applied to a large sample of Force Concept Inventory (FCI) pretest and post-test responses (N_{pre}=4509 and N_{post}=4716) to replicate the results of the original MAMCR study and to understand the origins of the gender differences reported...
Main Authors: | James Wells, Rachel Henderson, John Stewart, Gay Stewart, Jie Yang, Adrienne Traxler |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122 |
Similar Items
-
Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation with modified module analysis
by: James Wells, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
by: Jie Yang, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Partitioning the gender gap in physics conceptual inventories: Force Concept Inventory, Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation, and Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
by: Rachel Henderson, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
by: John Stewart, et al.
Published: (2007-02-01) -
Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
by: Rachel Henderson, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)