SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes are key determinants of chromosome conformation. Using Hi-C and polymer modelling, we study how cohesin and condensin, two deeply conserved SMC complexes, organize chromosomes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The canonical r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schalbetter, Stephanie Andrea, Belton, Jon-Matthew, Miles, Catrina, Yu, Miao, Dekker, Job, Baxter, Jonathan, Goloborodko, Anton, Fudenberg, Geoffrey, Mirny, Leonid A
Other Authors: Institute for Medical Engineering and Science
Format: Article
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2018
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114831
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-8616
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-6517
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-5410
_version_ 1826197636158324736
author Schalbetter, Stephanie Andrea
Belton, Jon-Matthew
Miles, Catrina
Yu, Miao
Dekker, Job
Baxter, Jonathan
Goloborodko, Anton
Fudenberg, Geoffrey
Mirny, Leonid A
author2 Institute for Medical Engineering and Science
author_facet Institute for Medical Engineering and Science
Schalbetter, Stephanie Andrea
Belton, Jon-Matthew
Miles, Catrina
Yu, Miao
Dekker, Job
Baxter, Jonathan
Goloborodko, Anton
Fudenberg, Geoffrey
Mirny, Leonid A
author_sort Schalbetter, Stephanie Andrea
collection MIT
description Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes are key determinants of chromosome conformation. Using Hi-C and polymer modelling, we study how cohesin and condensin, two deeply conserved SMC complexes, organize chromosomes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The canonical role of cohesin is to co-align sister chromatids, while condensin generally compacts mitotic chromosomes. We find strikingly different roles for the two complexes in budding yeast mitosis. First, cohesin is responsible for compacting mitotic chromosome arms, independently of sister chromatid cohesion. Polymer simulations demonstrate that this role can be fully accounted for through cis-looping of chromatin. Second, condensin is generally dispensable for compaction along chromosome arms. Instead, it plays a targeted role compacting the rDNA proximal regions and promoting resolution of peri-centromeric regions. Our results argue that the conserved mechanism of SMC complexes is to form chromatin loops and that distinct SMC-dependent looping activities are selectively deployed to appropriately compact chromosomes.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:50:40Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/114831
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:50:40Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1148312022-09-30T23:25:51Z SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context Schalbetter, Stephanie Andrea Belton, Jon-Matthew Miles, Catrina Yu, Miao Dekker, Job Baxter, Jonathan Goloborodko, Anton Fudenberg, Geoffrey Mirny, Leonid A Institute for Medical Engineering and Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics Goloborodko, Anton Fudenberg, Geoffrey Mirny, Leonid A Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes are key determinants of chromosome conformation. Using Hi-C and polymer modelling, we study how cohesin and condensin, two deeply conserved SMC complexes, organize chromosomes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The canonical role of cohesin is to co-align sister chromatids, while condensin generally compacts mitotic chromosomes. We find strikingly different roles for the two complexes in budding yeast mitosis. First, cohesin is responsible for compacting mitotic chromosome arms, independently of sister chromatid cohesion. Polymer simulations demonstrate that this role can be fully accounted for through cis-looping of chromatin. Second, condensin is generally dispensable for compaction along chromosome arms. Instead, it plays a targeted role compacting the rDNA proximal regions and promoting resolution of peri-centromeric regions. Our results argue that the conserved mechanism of SMC complexes is to form chromatin loops and that distinct SMC-dependent looping activities are selectively deployed to appropriately compact chromosomes. National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant R01HG003143) 2018-04-20T20:04:56Z 2018-04-20T20:04:56Z 2017-08 2017-03 2018-04-19T15:05:47Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1465-7392 1476-4679 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114831 Schalbetter, Stephanie Andrea et al “SMC Complexes Differentially Compact Mitotic Chromosomes According to Genomic Context.” Nature Cell Biology 19, 9 (August 2017): 1071–1080 © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-8616 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-6517 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-5410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NCB3594 Nature Cell Biology Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Nature Publishing Group PMC
spellingShingle Schalbetter, Stephanie Andrea
Belton, Jon-Matthew
Miles, Catrina
Yu, Miao
Dekker, Job
Baxter, Jonathan
Goloborodko, Anton
Fudenberg, Geoffrey
Mirny, Leonid A
SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
title SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
title_full SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
title_fullStr SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
title_full_unstemmed SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
title_short SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
title_sort smc complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114831
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-8616
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-6517
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0785-5410
work_keys_str_mv AT schalbetterstephanieandrea smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT beltonjonmatthew smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT milescatrina smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT yumiao smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT dekkerjob smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT baxterjonathan smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT goloborodkoanton smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT fudenberggeoffrey smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext
AT mirnyleonida smccomplexesdifferentiallycompactmitoticchromosomesaccordingtogenomiccontext