Why Take Both Boxes?
The crucial premise of the standard argument for two‐boxing in Newcomb's problem, a causal dominance principle, is false. We present some counterexamples. We then offer a metaethical explanation for why the counterexamples arise. Our explanation reveals a new and superior argument for two‐boxin...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2018
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115358 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-8346 |