Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing between intentional harms and accidents depends on the capacity for mental state reasoning (i.e., reasoning about beliefs and intentions), which is supported by a group of brain regions including the rig...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
2013
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81292 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791 |