Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions

Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing between intentional harms and accidents depends on the capacity for mental state reasoning (i.e., reasoning about beliefs and intentions), which is supported by a group of brain regions including the rig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koster-Hale, Jorie, Saxe, Rebecca R., Dungan, James, Young, Liane L.
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81292
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791
_version_ 1826213580057346048
author Koster-Hale, Jorie
Saxe, Rebecca R.
Dungan, James
Young, Liane L.
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Koster-Hale, Jorie
Saxe, Rebecca R.
Dungan, James
Young, Liane L.
author_sort Koster-Hale, Jorie
collection MIT
description Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing between intentional harms and accidents depends on the capacity for mental state reasoning (i.e., reasoning about beliefs and intentions), which is supported by a group of brain regions including the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ). Prior research has found that interfering with activity in RTPJ can impair mental state reasoning for moral judgment and that high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders make moral judgments based less on intent information than neurotypical participants. Three experiments, using multivoxel pattern analysis, find that (i) in neurotypical adults, the RTPJ shows reliable and distinct spatial patterns of responses across voxels for intentional vs. accidental harms, and (ii) individual differences in this neural pattern predict differences in participants’ moral judgments. These effects are specific to RTPJ. By contrast, (iii) this distinction was absent in adults with autism spectrum disorders. We conclude that multivoxel pattern analysis can detect features of mental state representations (e.g., intent), and that the corresponding neural patterns are behaviorally and clinically relevant.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:51:30Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/81292
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:51:30Z
publishDate 2013
publisher National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/812922022-10-02T04:36:43Z Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions Koster-Hale, Jorie Saxe, Rebecca R. Dungan, James Young, Liane L. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT Koster-Hale, Jorie Saxe, Rebecca R. Intentional harms are typically judged to be morally worse than accidental harms. Distinguishing between intentional harms and accidents depends on the capacity for mental state reasoning (i.e., reasoning about beliefs and intentions), which is supported by a group of brain regions including the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ). Prior research has found that interfering with activity in RTPJ can impair mental state reasoning for moral judgment and that high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders make moral judgments based less on intent information than neurotypical participants. Three experiments, using multivoxel pattern analysis, find that (i) in neurotypical adults, the RTPJ shows reliable and distinct spatial patterns of responses across voxels for intentional vs. accidental harms, and (ii) individual differences in this neural pattern predict differences in participants’ moral judgments. These effects are specific to RTPJ. By contrast, (iii) this distinction was absent in adults with autism spectrum disorders. We conclude that multivoxel pattern analysis can detect features of mental state representations (e.g., intent), and that the corresponding neural patterns are behaviorally and clinically relevant. National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant 1R01 MH096914-01A1) Simons Foundation National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant 095518) John Merck Scholars Program (Grant) Charles A. Dana Foundation National Science Foundation (U.S.). Graduate Research Fellowship Program (Grant 0645960) 2013-10-03T16:54:25Z 2013-10-03T16:54:25Z 2013-03 2012-05 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0027-8424 1091-6490 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81292 Koster-Hale, J., R. Saxe, J. Dungan, and L. L. Young. “Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 14 (April 2, 2013): 5648-5653. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791 en_US http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207992110 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf National Academy of Sciences (U.S.) PNAS
spellingShingle Koster-Hale, Jorie
Saxe, Rebecca R.
Dungan, James
Young, Liane L.
Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
title Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
title_full Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
title_fullStr Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
title_full_unstemmed Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
title_short Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
title_sort decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81292
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-1791
work_keys_str_mv AT kosterhalejorie decodingmoraljudgmentsfromneuralrepresentationsofintentions
AT saxerebeccar decodingmoraljudgmentsfromneuralrepresentationsofintentions
AT dunganjames decodingmoraljudgmentsfromneuralrepresentationsofintentions
AT younglianel decodingmoraljudgmentsfromneuralrepresentationsofintentions