Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021

In their interesting article, Werner and colleagues (Werner et al., 2021) found that deceptive up-pricing of cheap wine increased participants’ liking of the wine. Prior to their study, no other field study has examined consumers’ ratings of wines where only price information was experimentally m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Setoh, Peipei, Esposito, Gianluca
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/152486
_version_ 1826127082118184960
author Setoh, Peipei
Esposito, Gianluca
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Setoh, Peipei
Esposito, Gianluca
author_sort Setoh, Peipei
collection NTU
description In their interesting article, Werner and colleagues (Werner et al., 2021) found that deceptive up-pricing of cheap wine increased participants’ liking of the wine. Prior to their study, no other field study has examined consumers’ ratings of wines where only price information was experimentally manipulated (see however Mastrobuoni, Peracchi, & Tetenov, 2014 for a field experiment on effects of landscape images and randomly assigned price on tasters’ ratings of prosecco, merlot and tocai). Werner and colleagues’ study fills this gap in the literature by performing a field experiment which measured participants’ liking of three red wines at different price points twice - once without price information, and another time under the influence of price. Werner and colleagues found that the lowest priced wine was liked more when it was deceptively up-priced, in line with other research on the effect of price where demand or liking increased as price increased (Mastrobuoni et al., 2014; Plassmann, O’doherty, Shiv, & Rangel, 2008). Werner and colleagues were interested in how the subjective experience of wine will be influenced by price information of the wine. Subjective experience of wine was defined as “an umbrella term for pleasantness and taste intensity”, and hence pleasantness (measured by participants’ liking of the wine) and intensity were the two dependent variables of interest.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T07:02:56Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/152486
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T07:02:56Z
publishDate 2021
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/1524862023-03-05T15:33:59Z Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021 Setoh, Peipei Esposito, Gianluca School of Social Sciences Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) University of Trento, Italy Social sciences::Psychology Science::General Emotions Consumer Wine Preferences Pricing Signalling In their interesting article, Werner and colleagues (Werner et al., 2021) found that deceptive up-pricing of cheap wine increased participants’ liking of the wine. Prior to their study, no other field study has examined consumers’ ratings of wines where only price information was experimentally manipulated (see however Mastrobuoni, Peracchi, & Tetenov, 2014 for a field experiment on effects of landscape images and randomly assigned price on tasters’ ratings of prosecco, merlot and tocai). Werner and colleagues’ study fills this gap in the literature by performing a field experiment which measured participants’ liking of three red wines at different price points twice - once without price information, and another time under the influence of price. Werner and colleagues found that the lowest priced wine was liked more when it was deceptively up-priced, in line with other research on the effect of price where demand or liking increased as price increased (Mastrobuoni et al., 2014; Plassmann, O’doherty, Shiv, & Rangel, 2008). Werner and colleagues were interested in how the subjective experience of wine will be influenced by price information of the wine. Subjective experience of wine was defined as “an umbrella term for pleasantness and taste intensity”, and hence pleasantness (measured by participants’ liking of the wine) and intensity were the two dependent variables of interest. Accepted version 2021-08-23T08:42:16Z 2021-08-23T08:42:16Z 2021 Journal Article Setoh, P. & Esposito, G. (2021). Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021. Food Quality and Preference, 94, 104317-. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104317 0950-3293 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/152486 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104317 2-s2.0-85112008060 94 104317 en Food Quality and Preference © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Food Quality and Preference and is made available with permission of Elsevier Ltd. application/pdf
spellingShingle Social sciences::Psychology
Science::General
Emotions
Consumer
Wine
Preferences
Pricing
Signalling
Setoh, Peipei
Esposito, Gianluca
Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021
title Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021
title_full Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021
title_fullStr Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021
title_short Determinants of liking : a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences – a commentary on Werner and colleagues 2021
title_sort determinants of liking a call for multilevel assessment of wine preferences a commentary on werner and colleagues 2021
topic Social sciences::Psychology
Science::General
Emotions
Consumer
Wine
Preferences
Pricing
Signalling
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/152486
work_keys_str_mv AT setohpeipei determinantsoflikingacallformultilevelassessmentofwinepreferencesacommentaryonwernerandcolleagues2021
AT espositogianluca determinantsoflikingacallformultilevelassessmentofwinepreferencesacommentaryonwernerandcolleagues2021