Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites

Cryptic splice sites are used only when use of a natural splice site is disrupted by mutation. To determine the features that distinguish authentic from cryptic 5′ splice sites (5′ss), we systematically analyzed a set of 76 cryptic 5′ss derived from 46 human genes. These cryptic 5′ss have a similar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krainer, Adrian R., Sachidanandam, Ravi, Roca, Xavier
Other Authors: School of Biological Sciences
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/95535
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/8876
_version_ 1826122641317036032
author Krainer, Adrian R.
Sachidanandam, Ravi
Roca, Xavier
author2 School of Biological Sciences
author_facet School of Biological Sciences
Krainer, Adrian R.
Sachidanandam, Ravi
Roca, Xavier
author_sort Krainer, Adrian R.
collection NTU
description Cryptic splice sites are used only when use of a natural splice site is disrupted by mutation. To determine the features that distinguish authentic from cryptic 5′ splice sites (5′ss), we systematically analyzed a set of 76 cryptic 5′ss derived from 46 human genes. These cryptic 5′ss have a similar frequency distribution in exons and introns, and are usually located close to the authentic 5′ss. Statistical analysis of the strengths of the 5′ss using the Shapiro and Senapathy matrix revealed that authentic 5′ss have significantly higher score values than cryptic 5′ss, which in turn have higher values than the mutant ones. β‐Globin provides an interesting exception to this rule, so we chose it for detailed experimental analysis in vitro. We found that the sequences of the β‐globin authentic and cryptic 5′ss, but not their surrounding context, determine the correct 5′ss choice, although their respective scores do not reflect this functional difference. Our analysis provides a statistical basis to explain the competitive advantage of authentic over cryptic 5′ss in most cases, and should facilitate the development of tools to reliably predict the effect of disease‐associated 5′ss‐disrupting mutations at the mRNA level.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T05:51:29Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/95535
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T05:51:29Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/955352023-02-28T17:03:43Z Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites Krainer, Adrian R. Sachidanandam, Ravi Roca, Xavier School of Biological Sciences DRNTU::Science::Biological sciences Cryptic splice sites are used only when use of a natural splice site is disrupted by mutation. To determine the features that distinguish authentic from cryptic 5′ splice sites (5′ss), we systematically analyzed a set of 76 cryptic 5′ss derived from 46 human genes. These cryptic 5′ss have a similar frequency distribution in exons and introns, and are usually located close to the authentic 5′ss. Statistical analysis of the strengths of the 5′ss using the Shapiro and Senapathy matrix revealed that authentic 5′ss have significantly higher score values than cryptic 5′ss, which in turn have higher values than the mutant ones. β‐Globin provides an interesting exception to this rule, so we chose it for detailed experimental analysis in vitro. We found that the sequences of the β‐globin authentic and cryptic 5′ss, but not their surrounding context, determine the correct 5′ss choice, although their respective scores do not reflect this functional difference. Our analysis provides a statistical basis to explain the competitive advantage of authentic over cryptic 5′ss in most cases, and should facilitate the development of tools to reliably predict the effect of disease‐associated 5′ss‐disrupting mutations at the mRNA level. Accepted version 2012-12-21T01:49:51Z 2019-12-06T19:16:45Z 2012-12-21T01:49:51Z 2019-12-06T19:16:45Z 2003 2003 Journal Article Roca, X., Sachidanandam R., & Krainer A. R. (2003). Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(21), 6321-6333. 1362-4962 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/95535 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/8876 10.1093/nar/gkg830 14576320 en Nucleic acids research © 2003 Oxford University Press. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Nucleic Acids Research, Oxford University Press. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg830]. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Science::Biological sciences
Krainer, Adrian R.
Sachidanandam, Ravi
Roca, Xavier
Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites
title Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites
title_full Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites
title_fullStr Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites
title_full_unstemmed Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites
title_short Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites
title_sort intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5 splice sites
topic DRNTU::Science::Biological sciences
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/95535
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/8876
work_keys_str_mv AT kraineradrianr intrinsicdifferencesbetweenauthenticandcryptic5splicesites
AT sachidanandamravi intrinsicdifferencesbetweenauthenticandcryptic5splicesites
AT rocaxavier intrinsicdifferencesbetweenauthenticandcryptic5splicesites