When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.

Although randomised trials are widely accepted as the ideal way of obtaining unbiased estimates of treatment effects, some treatments have dramatic effects that are highly unlikely to reflect inadequately controlled biases. We compiled a list of historical examples of such effects and identified the...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Glasziou, P, Chalmers, I, Rawlins, M, McCulloch, P
Materyal Türü: Journal article
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2007
_version_ 1826260540636266496
author Glasziou, P
Chalmers, I
Rawlins, M
McCulloch, P
author_facet Glasziou, P
Chalmers, I
Rawlins, M
McCulloch, P
author_sort Glasziou, P
collection OXFORD
description Although randomised trials are widely accepted as the ideal way of obtaining unbiased estimates of treatment effects, some treatments have dramatic effects that are highly unlikely to reflect inadequately controlled biases. We compiled a list of historical examples of such effects and identified the features of convincing inferences about treatment effects from sources other than randomised trials. A unifying principle is the size of the treatment effect (signal) relative to the expected prognosis (noise) of the condition. A treatment effect is inferred most confidently when the signal to noise ratio is large and its timing is rapid compared with the natural course of the condition. For the examples we considered in detail the rate ratio often exceeds 10 and thus is highly unlikely to reflect bias or factors other than a treatment effect. This model may help to reduce controversy about evidence for treatments whose effects are so dramatic that randomised trials are unnecessary.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T19:07:16Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:15939a0b-c8ea-4b43-8a6c-92eb0a8fd6c5
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T19:07:16Z
publishDate 2007
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:15939a0b-c8ea-4b43-8a6c-92eb0a8fd6c52022-03-26T10:26:19ZWhen are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:15939a0b-c8ea-4b43-8a6c-92eb0a8fd6c5EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2007Glasziou, PChalmers, IRawlins, MMcCulloch, PAlthough randomised trials are widely accepted as the ideal way of obtaining unbiased estimates of treatment effects, some treatments have dramatic effects that are highly unlikely to reflect inadequately controlled biases. We compiled a list of historical examples of such effects and identified the features of convincing inferences about treatment effects from sources other than randomised trials. A unifying principle is the size of the treatment effect (signal) relative to the expected prognosis (noise) of the condition. A treatment effect is inferred most confidently when the signal to noise ratio is large and its timing is rapid compared with the natural course of the condition. For the examples we considered in detail the rate ratio often exceeds 10 and thus is highly unlikely to reflect bias or factors other than a treatment effect. This model may help to reduce controversy about evidence for treatments whose effects are so dramatic that randomised trials are unnecessary.
spellingShingle Glasziou, P
Chalmers, I
Rawlins, M
McCulloch, P
When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
title When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
title_full When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
title_fullStr When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
title_full_unstemmed When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
title_short When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
title_sort when are randomised trials unnecessary picking signal from noise
work_keys_str_mv AT glaszioup whenarerandomisedtrialsunnecessarypickingsignalfromnoise
AT chalmersi whenarerandomisedtrialsunnecessarypickingsignalfromnoise
AT rawlinsm whenarerandomisedtrialsunnecessarypickingsignalfromnoise
AT mccullochp whenarerandomisedtrialsunnecessarypickingsignalfromnoise