Authors’ reply to "Processing confusing procedures in the recent re-analysis of a cognitive bias modification meta-analysis"
Kruijt and Carlbring misrepresent the position conveyed in our commentary,1 wrongly attributing to us the suggestion ‘that we should only call CBM CBM if it is successful’. Our actual points are: (a) it cannot be claimed that cognitive bias has been modified when assessment data reveal that no modif...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|