Authors’ reply to "Processing confusing procedures in the recent re-analysis of a cognitive bias modification meta-analysis"

Authors’ reply to "Processing confusing procedures in the recent re-analysis of a cognitive bias modification meta-analysis"

Kruijt and Carlbring misrepresent the position conveyed in our commentary,1 wrongly attributing to us the suggestion ‘that we should only call CBM CBM if it is successful’. Our actual points are: (a) it cannot be claimed that cognitive bias has been modified when assessment data reveal that no modif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Grafton, B, Macleod, C, Rudaizky, D, Salemink, E, Fox, E, Notebaert, L
Format:	Journal article
Published:	Cambridge University Press 2018

Similar Items

Confusing procedures with process when appraising the impact of cognitive bias modification on emotional vulnerability
by: Grafton, B, et al.
Published: (2018)

Trait anxiety and the alignment of attentional bias with controllability of danger
by: Notebaert, L, et al.
Published: (2018)

When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour
by: Notebaert, L, et al.
Published: (2014)

Is manipulation of mood a critical component of cognitive bias modification procedures?
by: Standage, H, et al.
Published: (2010)

Introduction to the special section on cognitive bias modification in emotional disorders.
by: Koster, E, et al.
Published: (2009)

Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles.
by: MacLeod, C, et al.
Published: (2009)

The causal role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the modification of attentional bias: evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation.
by: Clarke, P, et al.
Published: (2014)

Imagine the bright side of life: A randomized controlled trial of two types of interpretation bias modification procedure targeting adolescent anxiety and depression.
by: E L de Voogd, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour.
by: Lies Notebaert, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Cognitive bias modification of interpretations for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: A meta‐analysis
by: Gemma Sicouri, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Abortion: time to clarify Australia's confusing laws - Reply
by: de Crespigny, L, et al.
Published: (2005)

Author's Reply. RE: The effectiveness of telepsychiatry: thematic review
by: Karrish Devan, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

REPLY TO THE AUTHORS: Re: Ureteroinguinal hernia with obstructive urolithiasis
by: JuliAnne R. Rathbun, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

SURVIVAL ANALYSIS - AUTHORS REPLY
by: Murray, D, et al.
Published: (1994)

Author′s Reply
by: Nosakhare J Iduoriyekemwen, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Cognitive bias modification: an intervention approach worth attending to.
by: Macleod, C, et al.
Published: (2012)

Authors' Reply
by: Eustathios I Kenanidis, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01)

The authors reply
by: Burdmann, E, et al.
Published: (2017)

A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD
by: Kruijt, A, et al.
Published: (2019)

The authors reply
by: Clatworthy, MR, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply
by: Saunders, N, et al.
Published: (2000)

Author reply
by: David W Dowdy, et al.
Published: (2009-12-01)

Author's reply
by: E. Bernabé Muñoz, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)

Authors′ reply
by: F V Mariano, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

Network meta-analysis of antidepressants - Authors' reply
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2018)

Authors′ reply
by: Mustafa Komur, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Authors' reply
by: Herbert, K, et al.
Published: (2012)

Authors' reply
by: Aveyard, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' reply
by: Sri Ramakrishnan, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Authors' Reply
by: Marcel Dudda, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01)

Authors' reply:
by: Garety, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

Authors' Reply
by: P McKenna, et al.
Published: (2008-04-01)

Author′s Reply
by: Farid E Stephan, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Authors′ reply
by: H I Onder, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Authors' Reply.
by: Jocelyn E Mackie, et al.
Published: (2006-06-01)

Reply of the Authors
by: Jessica K. Wu, B.S, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Bias and privacy in AI's cough-based COVID-19 recognition – Authors' reply
by: Harry Coppock, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

The authors reply
by: Kheifets, L, et al.
Published: (2011)

Authors’ reply to Beales
by: Goldacre, B, et al.
Published: (2017)

Authors' reply [4]
by: Farmer, A, et al.
Published: (2007)