Skip to content
VuFind
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Português
Português (Brasil)
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Türkçe
עברית
Gaeilge
Cymraeg
Ελληνικά
Català
Euskara
Русский
Čeština
Suomi
Svenska
polski
Dansk
slovenščina
اللغة العربية
বাংলা
Galego
Tiếng Việt
Hrvatski
हिंदी
Հայերէն
Українська
Sámegiella
Монгол
Language
All Fields
Title
Author
Subject
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Tag
Find
Advanced
Discussion: "Were the Ediacara...
Cite this
Text this
Email this
Print
Export Record
Export to RefWorks
Export to EndNoteWeb
Export to EndNote
Permanent link
Discussion: "Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?" by Retallack et al., Sedimentology, 59, 1208-1236
Show other versions (1)
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:
Callow, R
,
Brasier, M
,
Mcilroy, D
Format:
Journal article
Language:
English
Published:
2013
Holdings
Description
Other Versions (1)
Similar Items
Staff View
Similar Items
Discussion: "Were the Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?" by Retallack etal., Sedimentology, 59, 12081236
by: Callow, R, et al.
Published: (2013)
Remarkable preservation of microbial mats in Neoproterozoic siliciclastic settings: Implications for Ediacaran taphonomic models
by: Callow, R, et al.
Published: (2009)
A solution to Darwin's dilemma of 1859: exceptional preservation in Salter's material from the late Ediacaran Longmyndian Supergroup, England
by: Callow, R, et al.
Published: (2009)
Exploring an Ediacaran 'nursery': Growth, ecology and evolution in a rangeomorph palaeocommunity
by: Liu, A, et al.
Published: (2013)
A new assemblage of juvenile Ediacaran fronds from the Drook Formation, Newfoundland
by: Liu, A, et al.
Published: (2012)