In reply

In reply

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Boutron, I, Ravaud, P, Altman, D
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2010

Similar Items

Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results Reply
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2010)

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2010)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2015)

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
by: Mathieu, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2008)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2008)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment; explanation and elaboration
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Association between analytic strategy and estimates of treatment outcomes in meta-analyses.
by: Dechartres, A, et al.
Published: (2014)

Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
by: Lazarus, C, et al.
Published: (2016)

Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2014)

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial.
by: Barnes, C, et al.
Published: (2015)

CONSORT Statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2017)

Authors' reply to Bird.
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2012)

Reply
by: Raymond, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity
by: Yavchitz, A, et al.
Published: (2016)

From trial to practice Authors' reply
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2010)

Reporting noninferiority trials--reply.
by: Pocock, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

QRISK validation and evaluation Authors' reply
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2009)

Reply: An incomplete story
by: Cleland, JGF, et al.
Published: (2018)

Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2012)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2012)

Ethical issues in the reporting of clinical trials - Reply
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2001)

UPDATED VERSION OF QRISK2 Authors' reply to Bird
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2012)

Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study
by: Dechartres, A, et al.
Published: (2017)

Outcome reporting bias in government-funded RCTs - Reply
by: Chan, A, et al.
Published: (2005)

Bayesian stopping rules for trials - Reply
by: Parmar, M, et al.
Published: (2002)

The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening Reply
by: Marmot, MG, et al.
Published: (2013)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
by: Pino Cécile, et al.
Published: (2012-05-01)

Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020
by: Anna Pellat, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020.
by: Anna Pellat, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
by: Anna Pellat, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomized controlled trials
by: Chauvin, A, et al.
Published: (2017)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
by: Yavchitz, A, et al.
Published: (2014)

Fetal growth and ethnic variation--authors' reply.
by: Villar, J, et al.
Published: (2014)

ASSIST applicability scoring of surgical trials. an investigator-reported assessment tool.
by: Idriss Tourabaly, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
by: Amytis Heim, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

Comparison of treatment effect estimates for pharmacological randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults only and those including adults: a meta-epidemiological study.
by: Valérie Seegers, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

In reply
by: Berkley, J, et al.
Published: (2010)