The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima

Genotype-phenotype (GP) maps specify how the random mutations that change genotypes generate variation by altering phenotypes, which, in turn, can trigger selection. Many GP maps share the following general properties: 1) The total number of genotypes is much larger than the number of selectable ph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schaper, S, Louis, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
_version_ 1797061502448959488
author Schaper, S
Louis, A
author_facet Schaper, S
Louis, A
author_sort Schaper, S
collection OXFORD
description Genotype-phenotype (GP) maps specify how the random mutations that change genotypes generate variation by altering phenotypes, which, in turn, can trigger selection. Many GP maps share the following general properties: 1) The total number of genotypes is much larger than the number of selectable phenotypes; 2) Neutral exploration changes the variation that is accessible to the population; 3) The distribution of phenotype frequencies , with the number of genotypes mapping onto phenotype , is highly biased: the majority of genotypes map to only a small minority of the phenotypes. Here we explore how these properties affect the evolutionary dynamics of haploid Wright-Fisher models that are coupled to a random GP map or to a more complex RNA sequence to secondary structure map. For both maps the probability of a mutation leading to a phenotype scales to first order as , although for the RNA map there are further correlations as well. By using mean-field theory, supported by computer simulations, we show that the discovery time of a phenotype similarly scales to first order as for a wide range of population sizes and mutation rates in both the monomorphic and polymorphic regimes. These differences in the rate at which variation arises can vary over many orders of magnitude. Phenotypic variation with a larger is therefore be much more likely to arise than variation with a small . We show, using the RNA model, that frequent phenotypes (with larger ) can fix in a population even when alternative, but less frequent, phenotypes with much higher fitness are potentially accessible. In other words, if the fittest never ‘arrive’ on the timescales of evolutionary change, then they can't fix. We call this highly non-ergodic effect the ‘arrival of the frequent’.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:32:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:31645421-7d9e-4797-893a-276c8586aebd
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:32:05Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:31645421-7d9e-4797-893a-276c8586aebd2022-03-26T13:07:40ZThe arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optimaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:31645421-7d9e-4797-893a-276c8586aebdEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2014Schaper, SLouis, AGenotype-phenotype (GP) maps specify how the random mutations that change genotypes generate variation by altering phenotypes, which, in turn, can trigger selection. Many GP maps share the following general properties: 1) The total number of genotypes is much larger than the number of selectable phenotypes; 2) Neutral exploration changes the variation that is accessible to the population; 3) The distribution of phenotype frequencies , with the number of genotypes mapping onto phenotype , is highly biased: the majority of genotypes map to only a small minority of the phenotypes. Here we explore how these properties affect the evolutionary dynamics of haploid Wright-Fisher models that are coupled to a random GP map or to a more complex RNA sequence to secondary structure map. For both maps the probability of a mutation leading to a phenotype scales to first order as , although for the RNA map there are further correlations as well. By using mean-field theory, supported by computer simulations, we show that the discovery time of a phenotype similarly scales to first order as for a wide range of population sizes and mutation rates in both the monomorphic and polymorphic regimes. These differences in the rate at which variation arises can vary over many orders of magnitude. Phenotypic variation with a larger is therefore be much more likely to arise than variation with a small . We show, using the RNA model, that frequent phenotypes (with larger ) can fix in a population even when alternative, but less frequent, phenotypes with much higher fitness are potentially accessible. In other words, if the fittest never ‘arrive’ on the timescales of evolutionary change, then they can't fix. We call this highly non-ergodic effect the ‘arrival of the frequent’.
spellingShingle Schaper, S
Louis, A
The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima
title The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima
title_full The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima
title_fullStr The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima
title_full_unstemmed The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima
title_short The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima
title_sort arrival of the frequent how bias in genotype phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima
work_keys_str_mv AT schapers thearrivalofthefrequenthowbiasingenotypephenotypemapscansteerpopulationstolocaloptima
AT louisa thearrivalofthefrequenthowbiasingenotypephenotypemapscansteerpopulationstolocaloptima
AT schapers arrivalofthefrequenthowbiasingenotypephenotypemapscansteerpopulationstolocaloptima
AT louisa arrivalofthefrequenthowbiasingenotypephenotypemapscansteerpopulationstolocaloptima