A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
It is widely recommended that any developed—diagnostic or prognostic—prediction model is externally validated in terms of its predictive performance measured by calibration and discrimination. When multiple validations have been performed, a systematic review followed by a formal meta-analysis helps...
Auteurs principaux: | Debray, T, Damen, J, Riley, R, Snell, K, Reitsma, J, Hooft, L, Collins, G, Moons, K |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Langue: | English |
Publié: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Documents similaires
-
Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomes
par: Riley, R, et autres
Publié: (2018) -
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
par: Snell, KIE, et autres
Publié: (2023) -
A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
par: Riley, R, et autres
Publié: (2019) -
External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges
par: Riley, R, et autres
Publié: (2016) -
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome
par: Riley, RD, et autres
Publié: (2021)