Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Main Author: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2013
|
Similar Items
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
by: Sheehan, M, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
by: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
by: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
by: Živojinović Dragica
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Published: (2012)