Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
第一著者: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
フォーマット: | Journal article |
言語: | English |
出版事項: |
2013
|
類似資料
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
著者:: Sheehan, M, 等
出版事項: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
著者:: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, 等
出版事項: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
著者:: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., 等
出版事項: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
著者:: Živojinović Dragica
出版事項: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
出版事項: (2012)