Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Hoofdauteur: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Formaat: | Journal article |
Taal: | English |
Gepubliceerd in: |
2013
|
Gelijkaardige items
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
door: Sheehan, M, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
door: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
door: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
door: Živojinović Dragica
Gepubliceerd in: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Gepubliceerd in: (2012)