Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Главный автор: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Язык: | English |
Опубликовано: |
2013
|
Схожие документы
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
по: Sheehan, M, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
по: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
по: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., и др.
Опубликовано: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
по: Živojinović Dragica
Опубликовано: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Опубликовано: (2012)