Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Tác giả chính: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Journal article |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
2013
|
Những quyển sách tương tự
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
Bằng: Sheehan, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
Bằng: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
Bằng: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et al.
Được phát hành: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
Bằng: Živojinović Dragica
Được phát hành: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Được phát hành: (2012)