Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
CONTEXT: Selective reporting of outcomes within published studies based on the nature or direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct evidence of such bias is currently limited to case reports. OBJECTIVE: To study empirically the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a c...
প্রধান লেখক: | Chan, A, Hróbjartsson, A, Haahr, M, Gøtzsche, P, Altman, D |
---|---|
বিন্যাস: | Journal article |
ভাষা: | English |
প্রকাশিত: |
2004
|
অনুরূপ উপাদানগুলি
অনুরূপ উপাদানগুলি
-
Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
অনুযায়ী: Pildal, J, অন্যান্য
প্রকাশিত: (2005) -
Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory.
অনুযায়ী: Hróbjartsson, A, অন্যান্য
প্রকাশিত: (2009) -
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.
অনুযায়ী: Chan, A, অন্যান্য
প্রকাশিত: (2008) -
Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
অনুযায়ী: Mathieu, S, অন্যান্য
প্রকাশিত: (2009) -
Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
অনুযায়ী: Gøtzsche, P, অন্যান্য
প্রকাশিত: (2007)