Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

CONTEXT: Selective reporting of outcomes within published studies based on the nature or direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct evidence of such bias is currently limited to case reports. OBJECTIVE: To study empirically the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a c...

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors:	Chan, A, Hróbjartsson, A, Haahr, M, Gøtzsche, P, Altman, D
Format:	Journal article
Jezik:	English
Izdano:	2004

Podobne knjige/članki

Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
od: Pildal, J, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory.
od: Hróbjartsson, A, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
od: Mathieu, S, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
od: Gøtzsche, P, et al.
Izdano: (2007)

Constraints on publication rights in industry-initiated clinical trials.
od: Gøtzsche, P, et al.
Izdano: (2006)

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2003)

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.
od: Dwan, K, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Kontakt til udvalgene for videnskabelig uredelighed er det logiske skridt: Svar
od: Gøtzsche, P, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Videnskabelig uredelighed
od: Gøtzsche, P, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials.
od: Hopewell, S, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
od: Pildal, J, et al.
Izdano: (2007)

Randomized trials published in Chinese or Western journals: comparative empirical analysis.
od: Purgato, M, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
od: Song, F, et al.
Izdano: (2003)

Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Reminding peer reviewers of reporting guideline items to improve completeness in published articles: primary results of 2 randomized trials
od: Speich, B, et al.
Izdano: (2023)

Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The "Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature" or the SAMPL Guidelines.
od: Lang, T, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The "Statistical analyses and methods in the published literature" or the SAMPL guidelines
od: Lang, T, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Publishing journal articles /
od: Becker, Lucinda M., 1963-, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Missing outcomes in randomized trials: Addressing the dilemma
od: Altman, D
Izdano: (2009)

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles
od: Sekula, P, et al.
Izdano: (2017)

Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
od: Boutron, I, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols.
od: Pandis, N, et al.
Izdano: (2016)

Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines
od: Mallett, S, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines.
od: Mallett, S, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.
od: Calvert, M, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
od: Ioannidis, J, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Composite outcomes in cardiovascular research: a survey of randomized trials.
od: Lim, E, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Reported use of data monitoring committees in the main published reports of randomized controlled trials: a cross-sectional study.
od: Sydes, MR, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

What can we learn from publishing endoscopy trial protocols?
od: Koutsoumpas, A, et al.
Izdano: (2016)

The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.
od: Altman, D, et al.
Izdano: (2001)

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
od: Boutron, I, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

An open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial of the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin versus an aminoglycoside + ciprofloxacin in the treatment of bubonic plague (IMASOY): study protocol for a randomized control trial—an update to the published protocol
od: Randremanana, RV, et al.
Izdano: (2024)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
od: Dwan, K, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

REPORTING OF CONTINUOUS OUTCOME MEASURES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: IS THE WHOLE STORY BEING TOLD?
od: Savage, D, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

REPORTING OF CONTINUOUS OUTCOME MEASURES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: IS THE WHOLE STORY BEING TOLD?
od: Savage, D, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Lead editorial: trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials.
od: Altman, D, et al.
Izdano: (2006)