Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

CONTEXT: Selective reporting of outcomes within published studies based on the nature or direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct evidence of such bias is currently limited to case reports. OBJECTIVE: To study empirically the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a c...

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar:	Chan, A, Hróbjartsson, A, Haahr, M, Gøtzsche, P, Altman, D
Materyal Türü:	Journal article
Dil:	English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi:	2004

Benzer Materyaller

Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
Yazar:: Pildal, J, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2005)

Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory.
Yazar:: Hróbjartsson, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2009)

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.
Yazar:: Chan, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2008)

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Yazar:: Mathieu, S, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2009)

Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
Yazar:: Gøtzsche, P, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2007)

Constraints on publication rights in industry-initiated clinical trials.
Yazar:: Gøtzsche, P, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2006)

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials
Yazar:: Chan, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2003)

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.
Yazar:: Dwan, K, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2011)

Kontakt til udvalgene for videnskabelig uredelighed er det logiske skridt: Svar
Yazar:: Gøtzsche, P, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2009)

Videnskabelig uredelighed
Yazar:: Gøtzsche, P, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2009)

Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials.
Yazar:: Hopewell, S, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2011)

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Yazar:: Pildal, J, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2007)

Randomized trials published in Chinese or Western journals: comparative empirical analysis.
Yazar:: Purgato, M, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2012)

Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
Yazar:: Song, F, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2003)

Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.
Yazar:: Chan, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2005)

Reminding peer reviewers of reporting guideline items to improve completeness in published articles: primary results of 2 randomized trials
Yazar:: Speich, B, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2023)

Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The "Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature" or the SAMPL Guidelines.
Yazar:: Lang, T, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2015)

Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The "Statistical analyses and methods in the published literature" or the SAMPL guidelines
Yazar:: Lang, T, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2015)

Publishing journal articles /
Yazar:: Becker, Lucinda M., 1963-, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2012)

Missing outcomes in randomized trials: Addressing the dilemma
Yazar:: Altman, D
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2009)

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.
Yazar:: Chan, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013)

Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Yazar:: Chan, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2004)

Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles
Yazar:: Sekula, P, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2017)

Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yazar:: Boutron, I, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2014)

The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols.
Yazar:: Pandis, N, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2016)

Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines
Yazar:: Mallett, S, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2010)

Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines.
Yazar:: Mallett, S, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2010)

Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.
Yazar:: Calvert, M, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013)

Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
Yazar:: Ioannidis, J, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2004)

Composite outcomes in cardiovascular research: a survey of randomized trials.
Yazar:: Lim, E, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2008)

Reported use of data monitoring committees in the main published reports of randomized controlled trials: a cross-sectional study.
Yazar:: Sydes, MR, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2004)

What can we learn from publishing endoscopy trial protocols?
Yazar:: Koutsoumpas, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2016)

The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.
Yazar:: Altman, D, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2001)

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
Yazar:: Boutron, I, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2010)

An open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial of the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin versus an aminoglycoside + ciprofloxacin in the treatment of bubonic plague (IMASOY): study protocol for a randomized control trial—an update to the published protocol
Yazar:: Randremanana, RV, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2024)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
Yazar:: Dwan, K, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2008)

REPORTING OF CONTINUOUS OUTCOME MEASURES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: IS THE WHOLE STORY BEING TOLD?
Yazar:: Savage, D, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2010)

REPORTING OF CONTINUOUS OUTCOME MEASURES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: IS THE WHOLE STORY BEING TOLD?
Yazar:: Savage, D, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2010)

SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.
Yazar:: Chan, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013)

Lead editorial: trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials.
Yazar:: Altman, D, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2006)