An empirical ethical analysis of community treatment orders within mental health services in England

An empirical ethical analysis of community treatment orders within mental health services in England

Community treatment orders (CTOs) are a legal mechanism to extend powers of compulsion into outpatient mental health settings in certain circumstances. Previous ethical analyses of these powers have explored a perceived tension between a duty to respect personal freedoms and autonomy and a duty to e...

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors:	Dunn, M, Canvin, K, Rugkasa, J, Sinclair, J, Burns, T
Format:	Journal article
Izdano:	SAGE Publications 2016

Podobne knjige/članki

The use of leverage in community mental health: ethical guidance for practitioners.
od: Dunn, M, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Community Treatment Orders: a qualitative investigation of patient experiences in England
od: Rugkasa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Leverage and other informal pressures in community psychiatry in England.
od: Canvin, K, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Leverage and other informal pressures in community psychiatry in England
od: Canvin, K, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Patient, psychiatrist and family carer experiences of community treatment orders: qualitative study.
od: Canvin, K, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Threats and offers in community mental healthcare.
od: Dunn, M, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Threats and offers in community mental healthcare
od: Dunn, M, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Trust, deals and authority: community mental health professionals' experiences of influencing reluctant patients.
od: Rugkåsa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Lawfulness of a randomised trial of the new community treatment order regime for England and Wales.
od: Dawson, J, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Community treatment orders
od: Rugkåsa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Community treatment orders in England and Wales: National survey of clinicians' views and use
od: Manning, C, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Researching mental health in minority ethnic communities: reflections on recruitment.
od: Rugkåsa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Patient experiences of leverage (informal coercion) in England: findings from a qualitative study
od: Canvin, K, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
od: Jorun Rugkåsa, et al.
Izdano: (2017-11-01)

A systematic review of the effect of community treatment orders on service use.
od: Maughan, D, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Coercion in mental health: a trial of the effectiveness of community treatment orders and an investigation of informal coercion in community mental health care
od: Tom Burns, et al.
Izdano: (2016-12-01)

Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis - Authors' reply.
od: Burns, T, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Associations between compulsory community treatment and continuity of care in a three year follow-up of the Oxford Community Treatment Order Trial (OCTET) cohort
od: Puntis, S, et al.
Izdano: (2017)

A 'bittersweet pill to swallow': learning from mental health service users' responses to compulsory community care in England.
od: Canvin, K, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Mental health, coercion and family caregiving: issues from the international literature
od: Jorun Rugkåsa, et al.
Izdano: (2017-08-01)

Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on Supervised Discharge and Guardianship.
od: Canvin, K, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Coercion and compulsion in community mental health care.
od: Molodynski, A, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial.
od: Burns, T, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): A randomised controlled trial
od: Burns, T, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Community treatment orders: current evidence and the implications.
od: Rugkåsa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Recall of patients on community treatment orders over three years in the OCTET CTO cohort.
od: Rugkåsa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2016)

Community treatment orders: how ethical without experimental evidence?
od: Burns, T, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Community treatment orders and social outcomes for patients with psychosis: a 48-month follow-up study.
od: Vergunst, F, et al.
Izdano: (2017)

What does being on a community treatment orders entail? A 3-year follow-up of the OCTET CTO cohort
od: Rugkåsa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2016)

UK psychiatrists' opinions and experiences of Community Treatment Orders
od: Molodynski, A, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Community treatment orders: clinical and social outcomes, and a subgroup analysis from the OCTET RCT.
od: Rugkåsa, J, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Cost and quality-of-life impacts of community treatment orders (CTOs) for patients with psychosis: economic evaluation of the OCTET trial
od: Simon, J, et al.
Izdano: (2020)

Community supervision orders for the mentally ill: Mental health professionals' attitudes
od: Burns, T
Izdano: (1995)

Impact of introducing capacity-based mental health legislation on the use of community treatment orders in Norway: case registry study
od: Georg Høyer, et al.
Izdano: (2022-01-01)

Professionals’ perspectives on factors within primary mental health services that can affect pathways to involuntary psychiatric admissions
od: Irene Wormdahl, et al.
Izdano: (2020-11-01)

Mental health professionals favour community supervision orders.
od: Burns, T, et al.
Izdano: (1993)

The legacy of therapeutic community practice in modern community mental health services
od: Burns, T
Izdano: (2000)

Community treatment orders: state of the evidence.
od: Burns, T
Izdano: (2013)

Mental health care failure in England. Myth and reality.
od: Burns, T, et al.
Izdano: (1999)

Ethical analysis of the new proposed mental health legislation in England and Wales
od: Lepping Peter
Izdano: (2007-04-01)