Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches
In 1996, Kim Nasmyth1 proposed that the eukaryotic cell cycle is an alternating sequence of transitions from G1 to S-G2-M and back again. These two phases correlate to high activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that trigger S-G2-M events and CDK antagonists that stabilize G1 phase. We associat...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cell Press
2022
|
| _version_ | 1797107468435718144 |
|---|---|
| author | Novak, B Tyson, JJ |
| author_facet | Novak, B Tyson, JJ |
| author_sort | Novak, B |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In 1996, Kim Nasmyth1 proposed that the eukaryotic cell cycle is an alternating sequence of transitions from G1 to S-G2-M and back again. These two phases correlate to high activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that trigger S-G2-M events and CDK antagonists that stabilize G1 phase. We associated these “alternative phases” with the coexistence of two stable steady states of the biochemical reactions among CDKs and their antagonists.2,3 Transitions between these steady states (G1-to-S and M-to-G1) are driven by “helper” proteins. The fact that the transitions are irreversible is guaranteed by a “latching” property of the molecular switches, as we have argued in previous publications.4,5 Here, we show that if the latch is broken, then the biochemical reactions can swing back-and-forth across the transitions; either G1-S-G1-S … (periodic DNA replication without mitosis or cell division) or M-(G1)-M-(G1) … (periodic Cdc14 release, without fully exiting mitosis). Using mathematical modeling of the molecular control circuit in budding yeast, we provide a fresh account of aberrant cell cycles in mutant strains: endoreplication in the clb1-5Δ strain6 and periodic release and resequestration of Cdc14 (an “exit” phosphatase) in the CLB2kdΔ strain.7,8 In our opinion, these “endocycles” are not autonomous oscillatory modules that must be entrained by the CDK oscillator6,7 but rather inadvertent and deleterious oscillations that are normally suppressed by the CDK latching-gate mechanism.8
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:16:35Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:44c11808-a033-4880-9603-3c9a33bc8047 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:16:35Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Cell Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:44c11808-a033-4880-9603-3c9a33bc80472022-08-16T08:41:23ZMitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switchesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:44c11808-a033-4880-9603-3c9a33bc8047EnglishSymplectic ElementsCell Press2022Novak, BTyson, JJIn 1996, Kim Nasmyth1 proposed that the eukaryotic cell cycle is an alternating sequence of transitions from G1 to S-G2-M and back again. These two phases correlate to high activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that trigger S-G2-M events and CDK antagonists that stabilize G1 phase. We associated these “alternative phases” with the coexistence of two stable steady states of the biochemical reactions among CDKs and their antagonists.2,3 Transitions between these steady states (G1-to-S and M-to-G1) are driven by “helper” proteins. The fact that the transitions are irreversible is guaranteed by a “latching” property of the molecular switches, as we have argued in previous publications.4,5 Here, we show that if the latch is broken, then the biochemical reactions can swing back-and-forth across the transitions; either G1-S-G1-S … (periodic DNA replication without mitosis or cell division) or M-(G1)-M-(G1) … (periodic Cdc14 release, without fully exiting mitosis). Using mathematical modeling of the molecular control circuit in budding yeast, we provide a fresh account of aberrant cell cycles in mutant strains: endoreplication in the clb1-5Δ strain6 and periodic release and resequestration of Cdc14 (an “exit” phosphatase) in the CLB2kdΔ strain.7,8 In our opinion, these “endocycles” are not autonomous oscillatory modules that must be entrained by the CDK oscillator6,7 but rather inadvertent and deleterious oscillations that are normally suppressed by the CDK latching-gate mechanism.8 |
| spellingShingle | Novak, B Tyson, JJ Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches |
| title | Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches |
| title_full | Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches |
| title_fullStr | Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches |
| title_short | Mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches |
| title_sort | mitotic kinase oscillation governs the latching of cell cycle switches |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT novakb mitotickinaseoscillationgovernsthelatchingofcellcycleswitches AT tysonjj mitotickinaseoscillationgovernsthelatchingofcellcycleswitches |