Skip to content
VuFind
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Português
Português (Brasil)
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Türkçe
עברית
Gaeilge
Cymraeg
Ελληνικά
Català
Euskara
Русский
Čeština
Suomi
Svenska
polski
Dansk
slovenščina
اللغة العربية
বাংলা
Galego
Tiếng Việt
Hrvatski
हिंदी
Հայերէն
Українська
Sámegiella
Монгол
Language
All Fields
Title
Author
Subject
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Tag
Find
Advanced
The quality of systematic revi...
Cite this
Text this
Email this
Print
Export Record
Export to RefWorks
Export to EndNoteWeb
Export to EndNote
Permanent link
The quality of systematic reviews. High quality reporting of both randomised trials and systematic reviews should be priority.
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:
Altman, D
,
Decks, J
,
Clarke, M
,
Cates, C
Format:
Journal article
Language:
English
Published:
2000
Holdings
Description
Similar Items
Staff View
Similar Items
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.
by: Plint, A, et al.
Published: (2006)
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
by: Pussegoda, K, et al.
Published: (2017)
Improving the quality and reporting of systematic reviews.
by: Eccleston, C, et al.
Published: (2010)
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.
by: Jüni, P, et al.
Published: (2001)
Systematic review of the methodological and reporting quality of case series in surgery
by: Agha, R, et al.
Published: (2016)