‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy
For the concept of nature positive to succeed as the lodestar for international action on biodiversity conservation, it must build upon lessons learned from the application of the mitigation hierarchy — or risk becoming mere greenwash.
Main Authors: | Maron, M, Quétier, F, Sarmiento, M, ten Kate, K, Evans, MC, Bull, JW, Jones, JPG, Zu Ermgassen, SOSE, Milner-Gulland, EJ, Brownlie, S, Treweek, J, von Hase, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2023
|
Similar Items
-
Analyzing the outcomes of China's ecological compensation scheme for development-related biodiversity loss
by: Gao, S, et al.
Published: (2023) -
China makes developers pay compensation for their ecological impacts – here’s how this unique scheme works
by: Gao, S, et al.
Published: (2023) -
No consistent relationship found between biodiversity metric habitat scores and the presence of species of conservation priority
by: Hawkins, I, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Nature-based credit markets at a crossroads
by: Swinfield, T, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation
by: Zu Ermgassen, SOSE, et al.
Published: (2023)