‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy
For the concept of nature positive to succeed as the lodestar for international action on biodiversity conservation, it must build upon lessons learned from the application of the mitigation hierarchy — or risk becoming mere greenwash.
Главные авторы: | Maron, M, Quétier, F, Sarmiento, M, ten Kate, K, Evans, MC, Bull, JW, Jones, JPG, Zu Ermgassen, SOSE, Milner-Gulland, EJ, Brownlie, S, Treweek, J, von Hase, A |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Язык: | English |
Опубликовано: |
Springer Nature
2023
|
Схожие документы
-
Analyzing the outcomes of China's ecological compensation scheme for development-related biodiversity loss
по: Gao, S, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023) -
China makes developers pay compensation for their ecological impacts – here’s how this unique scheme works
по: Gao, S, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023) -
No consistent relationship found between biodiversity metric habitat scores and the presence of species of conservation priority
по: Hawkins, I, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022) -
Nature-based credit markets at a crossroads
по: Swinfield, T, и др.
Опубликовано: (2024) -
Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation
по: Zu Ermgassen, SOSE, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)