Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation.
<p><strong>Background</strong> CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797068936977580032 |
|---|---|
| author | Gurumurthy, C O'Brien, A Quadros, R Adams, J Alcaide, P Ayabe, S Ballard, J Batra, S Beauchamp, M Becker, K Bernas, G Brough, D Carrillo-Salinas, F Chan, W Chen, H Dawson, R Demambro, V D'Hont, J Dibb, K Eudy, J Gan, L Gao, J Gonzales, A Guntur, A Guo, H Harms, D Harrington, A Hentges, K Humphreys, N Imai, S Ishii, H Iwama, M Jonasch, E Karolak, M Keavney, B Khin, N Konno, M Kotani, Y Kunihiro, Y Lakshmanan, I Larochelle, C Lawrence, C Li, L Lindner, V Liu, X Lopez-Castejon, G Loudon, A Lowe, J Jerome-Majewska, L Matsusaka, T Miura, H Miyasaka, Y Morpurgo, B Motyl, K Nabeshima, Y Nakade, K Nakashiba, T Nakashima, K Obata, Y Ogiwara, S Ouellet, M Oxburgh, L Piltz, S Pinz, I Ponnusamy, M Ray, D Redder, R Rosen, C Ross, N Ruhe, M Ryzhova, L Salvador, A Alam, S Sedlacek, R Sharma, K Smith, C Staes, K Starrs, L Sugiyama, F Takahashi, S Tanaka, T Trafford, A Uno, Y Vanhoutte, L Vanrockeghem, F Willis, B Wright, C Yamauchi, Y Yi, X Yoshimi, K Zhang, X Zhang, Y Ohtsuka, M Das, S Garry, D Hochepied, T Thomas, P Parker-Thornburg, J Adamson, A Yoshiki, A Schmouth, J Golovko, A Thompson, W Lloyd, K Wood, J Cowan, M Mashimo, T Mizuno, S Zhu, H Kasparek, P Liaw, L Miano, J Burgio, G |
| author_facet | Gurumurthy, C O'Brien, A Quadros, R Adams, J Alcaide, P Ayabe, S Ballard, J Batra, S Beauchamp, M Becker, K Bernas, G Brough, D Carrillo-Salinas, F Chan, W Chen, H Dawson, R Demambro, V D'Hont, J Dibb, K Eudy, J Gan, L Gao, J Gonzales, A Guntur, A Guo, H Harms, D Harrington, A Hentges, K Humphreys, N Imai, S Ishii, H Iwama, M Jonasch, E Karolak, M Keavney, B Khin, N Konno, M Kotani, Y Kunihiro, Y Lakshmanan, I Larochelle, C Lawrence, C Li, L Lindner, V Liu, X Lopez-Castejon, G Loudon, A Lowe, J Jerome-Majewska, L Matsusaka, T Miura, H Miyasaka, Y Morpurgo, B Motyl, K Nabeshima, Y Nakade, K Nakashiba, T Nakashima, K Obata, Y Ogiwara, S Ouellet, M Oxburgh, L Piltz, S Pinz, I Ponnusamy, M Ray, D Redder, R Rosen, C Ross, N Ruhe, M Ryzhova, L Salvador, A Alam, S Sedlacek, R Sharma, K Smith, C Staes, K Starrs, L Sugiyama, F Takahashi, S Tanaka, T Trafford, A Uno, Y Vanhoutte, L Vanrockeghem, F Willis, B Wright, C Yamauchi, Y Yi, X Yoshimi, K Zhang, X Zhang, Y Ohtsuka, M Das, S Garry, D Hochepied, T Thomas, P Parker-Thornburg, J Adamson, A Yoshiki, A Schmouth, J Golovko, A Thompson, W Lloyd, K Wood, J Cowan, M Mashimo, T Mizuno, S Zhu, H Kasparek, P Liaw, L Miano, J Burgio, G |
| author_sort | Gurumurthy, C |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p><strong>Background</strong> CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout (cKO or floxed) alleles by microinjection of 2 single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and 2 single-stranded oligonucleotides as donors (referred herein as “two-donor floxing” method).</p> <p><strong>Result</strong> We re-evaluate the two-donor method from a consortium of 20 laboratories across the world. The dataset constitutes 56 genetic loci, 17,887 zygotes, and 1718 live-born mice, of which only 15 (0.87%) mice contain cKO alleles. We subject the dataset to statistical analyses and a machine learning algorithm, which reveals that none of the factors analyzed was predictive for the success of this method. We test some of the newer methods that use one-donor DNA on 18 loci for which the two-donor approach failed to produce cKO alleles. We find that the one-donor methods are 10- to 20-fold more efficient than the two-donor approach.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> We propose that the two-donor method lacks efficiency because it relies on two simultaneous recombination events in <em>cis</em>, an outcome that is dwarfed by pervasive accompanying undesired editing events. The methods that use one-donor DNA are fairly efficient as they rely on only one recombination event, and the probability of correct insertion of the donor cassette without unanticipated mutational events is much higher. Therefore, one-donor methods offer higher efficiencies for the routine generation of cKO animal models.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:17:11Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:53c52dbc-5d57-43e5-b0f6-9e3afb3a627b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:17:11Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:53c52dbc-5d57-43e5-b0f6-9e3afb3a627b2022-03-26T16:34:08ZReproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:53c52dbc-5d57-43e5-b0f6-9e3afb3a627bEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2019Gurumurthy, CO'Brien, AQuadros, RAdams, JAlcaide, PAyabe, SBallard, JBatra, SBeauchamp, MBecker, KBernas, GBrough, DCarrillo-Salinas, FChan, WChen, HDawson, RDemambro, VD'Hont, JDibb, KEudy, JGan, LGao, JGonzales, AGuntur, AGuo, HHarms, DHarrington, AHentges, KHumphreys, NImai, SIshii, HIwama, MJonasch, EKarolak, MKeavney, BKhin, NKonno, MKotani, YKunihiro, YLakshmanan, ILarochelle, CLawrence, CLi, LLindner, VLiu, XLopez-Castejon, GLoudon, ALowe, JJerome-Majewska, LMatsusaka, TMiura, HMiyasaka, YMorpurgo, BMotyl, KNabeshima, YNakade, KNakashiba, TNakashima, KObata, YOgiwara, SOuellet, MOxburgh, LPiltz, SPinz, IPonnusamy, MRay, DRedder, RRosen, CRoss, NRuhe, MRyzhova, LSalvador, AAlam, SSedlacek, RSharma, KSmith, CStaes, KStarrs, LSugiyama, FTakahashi, STanaka, TTrafford, AUno, YVanhoutte, LVanrockeghem, FWillis, BWright, CYamauchi, YYi, XYoshimi, KZhang, XZhang, YOhtsuka, MDas, SGarry, DHochepied, TThomas, PParker-Thornburg, JAdamson, AYoshiki, ASchmouth, JGolovko, AThompson, WLloyd, KWood, JCowan, MMashimo, TMizuno, SZhu, HKasparek, PLiaw, LMiano, JBurgio, G<p><strong>Background</strong> CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout (cKO or floxed) alleles by microinjection of 2 single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and 2 single-stranded oligonucleotides as donors (referred herein as “two-donor floxing” method).</p> <p><strong>Result</strong> We re-evaluate the two-donor method from a consortium of 20 laboratories across the world. The dataset constitutes 56 genetic loci, 17,887 zygotes, and 1718 live-born mice, of which only 15 (0.87%) mice contain cKO alleles. We subject the dataset to statistical analyses and a machine learning algorithm, which reveals that none of the factors analyzed was predictive for the success of this method. We test some of the newer methods that use one-donor DNA on 18 loci for which the two-donor approach failed to produce cKO alleles. We find that the one-donor methods are 10- to 20-fold more efficient than the two-donor approach.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> We propose that the two-donor method lacks efficiency because it relies on two simultaneous recombination events in <em>cis</em>, an outcome that is dwarfed by pervasive accompanying undesired editing events. The methods that use one-donor DNA are fairly efficient as they rely on only one recombination event, and the probability of correct insertion of the donor cassette without unanticipated mutational events is much higher. Therefore, one-donor methods offer higher efficiencies for the routine generation of cKO animal models.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Gurumurthy, C O'Brien, A Quadros, R Adams, J Alcaide, P Ayabe, S Ballard, J Batra, S Beauchamp, M Becker, K Bernas, G Brough, D Carrillo-Salinas, F Chan, W Chen, H Dawson, R Demambro, V D'Hont, J Dibb, K Eudy, J Gan, L Gao, J Gonzales, A Guntur, A Guo, H Harms, D Harrington, A Hentges, K Humphreys, N Imai, S Ishii, H Iwama, M Jonasch, E Karolak, M Keavney, B Khin, N Konno, M Kotani, Y Kunihiro, Y Lakshmanan, I Larochelle, C Lawrence, C Li, L Lindner, V Liu, X Lopez-Castejon, G Loudon, A Lowe, J Jerome-Majewska, L Matsusaka, T Miura, H Miyasaka, Y Morpurgo, B Motyl, K Nabeshima, Y Nakade, K Nakashiba, T Nakashima, K Obata, Y Ogiwara, S Ouellet, M Oxburgh, L Piltz, S Pinz, I Ponnusamy, M Ray, D Redder, R Rosen, C Ross, N Ruhe, M Ryzhova, L Salvador, A Alam, S Sedlacek, R Sharma, K Smith, C Staes, K Starrs, L Sugiyama, F Takahashi, S Tanaka, T Trafford, A Uno, Y Vanhoutte, L Vanrockeghem, F Willis, B Wright, C Yamauchi, Y Yi, X Yoshimi, K Zhang, X Zhang, Y Ohtsuka, M Das, S Garry, D Hochepied, T Thomas, P Parker-Thornburg, J Adamson, A Yoshiki, A Schmouth, J Golovko, A Thompson, W Lloyd, K Wood, J Cowan, M Mashimo, T Mizuno, S Zhu, H Kasparek, P Liaw, L Miano, J Burgio, G Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation. |
| title | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation. |
| title_full | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation. |
| title_fullStr | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation. |
| title_short | Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation. |
| title_sort | reproducibility of crispr cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles a multi center evaluation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gurumurthyc reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT obriena reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT quadrosr reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT adamsj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT alcaidep reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ayabes reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ballardj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT batras reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT beauchampm reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT beckerk reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT bernasg reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT broughd reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT carrillosalinasf reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT chanw reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT chenh reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dawsonr reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT demambrov reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dhontj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dibbk reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT eudyj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ganl reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT gaoj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT gonzalesa reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT guntura reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT guoh reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT harmsd reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT harringtona reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT hentgesk reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT humphreysn reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT imais reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ishiih reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT iwamam reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT jonasche reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT karolakm reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT keavneyb reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT khinn reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT konnom reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT kotaniy reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT kunihiroy reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lakshmanani reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT larochellec reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lawrencec reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lil reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lindnerv reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT liux reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lopezcastejong reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT loudona reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lowej reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT jeromemajewskal reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT matsusakat reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT miurah reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT miyasakay reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT morpurgob reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT motylk reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nabeshimay reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nakadek reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nakashibat reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT nakashimak reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT obatay reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ogiwaras reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ouelletm reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT oxburghl reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT piltzs reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT pinzi reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ponnusamym reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT rayd reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT redderr reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT rosenc reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT rossn reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ruhem reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ryzhoval reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT salvadora reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT alams reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT sedlacekr reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT sharmak reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT smithc reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT staesk reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT starrsl reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT sugiyamaf reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT takahashis reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT tanakat reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT trafforda reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT unoy reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT vanhouttel reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT vanrockeghemf reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT willisb reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT wrightc reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yamauchiy reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yix reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yoshimik reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT zhangx reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT zhangy reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT ohtsukam reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT dass reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT garryd reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT hochepiedt reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT thomasp reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT parkerthornburgj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT adamsona reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT yoshikia reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT schmouthj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT golovkoa reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT thompsonw reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT lloydk reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT woodj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT cowanm reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT mashimot reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT mizunos reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT zhuh reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT kasparekp reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT liawl reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT mianoj reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation AT burgiog reproducibilityofcrisprcas9methodsforgenerationofconditionalmouseallelesamulticenterevaluation |