Sidgwick and Rawls on distributive justice and desert
This article explores, comparatively and critically, Sidgwick’s and Rawls’s reasons for rejecting desert as a principle of distributive justice. Their ethical methods, though not identical, each require giving weight to common sense convictions about justice as well as higher-level principles. Both...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|