Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorporated into the statistical analysis and overall findings of a systematic review. DESIGN: A cross-sectional review. SAMPLE: We assessed 200 systematic reviews of randomised trials published between J...
Asıl Yazarlar: | Hopewell, S, Boutron, I, Altman, D, Ravaud, P |
---|---|
Materyal Türü: | Journal article |
Dil: | English |
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Benzer Materyaller
-
Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences
Yazar:: Hopewell, S, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2015) -
Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials.
Yazar:: Bruno Giraudeau, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2009-05-01) -
Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
Yazar:: Yavchitz, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2014) -
A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomized controlled trials
Yazar:: Chauvin, A, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2017) -
Characteristics of non-randomised studies of drug treatments: cross sectional study
Yazar:: Raphaël Porcher, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2024-08-01)