Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

<strong>Objectives<br></strong> In biomedical research, spin is the overinterpretation of findings, and it is a growing concern. To date, the presence of spin has not been evaluated in prognostic model research in oncology, including studies developing and validating models for ind...

תיאור מלא

מידע ביבליוגרפי
Main Authors:	Dhiman, P, Ma, J, Andaur Navarro, CL, Speich, B, Bullock, G, Damen, JAA, Hooft, L, Kirtley, S, Riley, RD, Van Calster, B, Moons, KGM, Collins, GS
פורמט:	Journal article
שפה:	English
יצא לאור:	Elsevier 2023

פריטים דומים

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
מאת: Dhiman, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
מאת: Dhiman, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2022)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
מאת: Dhiman, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2021)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
מאת: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
מאת: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
יצא לאור: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
מאת: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
יצא לאור: (2021)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review
מאת: Kempf, E, et al.
יצא לאור: (2018)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
מאת: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
יצא לאור: (2022)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
מאת: Paula Dhiman, et al.
יצא לאור: (2022-07-01)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in medical oncology
מאת: Kempf, E, et al.
יצא לאור: (2016)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
מאת: Snell, KIE, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
מאת: Levis, B, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
מאת: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
יצא לאור: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
מאת: Collins, GS, et al.
יצא לאור: (2021)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
מאת: Debray, TPA, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
מאת: Debray, TPA, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

Overinterpretation is common in pathological diagnosis of appendix cancer during patient referral for oncologic care.
מאת: Mark A Valasek, et al.
יצא לאור: (2017-01-01)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
מאת: Collins, GS, et al.
יצא לאור: (2024)

Mosaicism in preimplantation embryos: Are we overinterpreting the results?
מאת: Glenn Schattman, M.D.
יצא לאור: (2023-09-01)

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning
מאת: Collins, GS, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R2 from a reported C statistic (AUROC) to inform sample size calculations for developing a prediction model with a binary outcome
מאת: Riley, RD, et al.
יצא לאור: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
מאת: Heus, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2020)

Overinterpretation and Overtreatment of Low-Titer Antibodies Against Contactin-Associated Protein-2
מאת: Christian G. Bien
יצא לאור: (2018-04-01)

Interpretation and Overinterpretation of Ja’far Ibn Hasan Al-Barzanji’s Mawlid Al-Barzanji
מאת: Fadlil Munawwar Mashur
יצא לאור: (2017-10-01)

Multivariate unmixing approaches on Raman images of plant cell walls: new insights or overinterpretation of results?
מאת: Batirtze Prats-Mateu, et al.
יצא לאור: (2018-07-01)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
מאת: Gary S Collins, et al.
יצא לאור: (2021-07-01)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
מאת: Gary S Collins, et al.
יצא לאור: (2020-11-01)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
מאת: Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, et al.
יצא לאור: (2022-01-01)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
מאת: Van Calster, B, et al.
יצא לאור: (2021)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
מאת: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, et al.
יצא לאור: (2020)

Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations
מאת: Schlussel, MM, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
מאת: Nguyen, T-L, et al.
יצא לאור: (2020)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
מאת: Wolff, RF, et al.
יצא לאור: (2019)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
מאת: Dhiman, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

A systematic review showed more consideration is needed when conducting nonrandomized studies of interventions.
מאת: Dhiman, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2019)

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review
מאת: Ma, J, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

Regarding a nomogram to predict osteoradionecrosis in oral cancer after marginal mandibulectomy and radiotherapy
מאת: Collins, GS, et al.
יצא לאור: (2019)

Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018–2019
מאת: Logullo, P, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
מאת: Debray, T, et al.
יצא לאור: (2018)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression
מאת: Pate, A, et al.
יצא לאור: (2023)