Skip to content
VuFind
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
日本語
Nederlands
Português
Português (Brasil)
中文(简体)
中文（繁體）
Türkçe
עברית
Gaeilge
Cymraeg
Ελληνικά
Català
Euskara
Русский
Čeština
Suomi
Svenska
polski
Dansk
slovenščina
اللغة العربية
বাংলা
Galego
Tiếng Việt
Hrvatski
हिंदी
Հայերէն
Українська
Sámegiella
Монгол
Language
All Fields
Title
Author
Subject
Call Number
ISBN/ISSN
Tag
Find
Advanced
Improving the peer-review proc...
Cite this
Text this
Email this
Print
Export Record
Export to RefWorks
Export to EndNoteWeb
Export to EndNote
Permanent link
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity and generalization
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:
Marsh, H
,
Bond
,
W., N
,
Jayasinghe
,
W., U
Format:
Journal article
Published:
2008
Holdings
Description
Similar Items
Staff View
Similar Items
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
by: Marsh, H, et al.
Published: (2008)
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
by: Marsh, H, et al.
Published: (2011)
Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
by: Marsh, H, et al.
Published: (2011)
A new reader trial approach to peer review in funding research grants: An Australian experiment
by: Jayasinghe, U, et al.
Published: (2006)
A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings
by: Jayasinghe, U, et al.
Published: (2003)