Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city

In this paper we examine the precarious everyday geographies of property guardianship in the United Kingdom. Temporary property guardianship is a relatively new form of insecure urban dwelling existing in the grey area between informal occupation, the security industry and housing. Young individuals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferreri, M, Dawson, G, Vasudevan, A
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2016
_version_ 1797071868724772864
author Ferreri, M
Dawson, G
Vasudevan, A
author_facet Ferreri, M
Dawson, G
Vasudevan, A
author_sort Ferreri, M
collection OXFORD
description In this paper we examine the precarious everyday geographies of property guardianship in the United Kingdom. Temporary property guardianship is a relatively new form of insecure urban dwelling existing in the grey area between informal occupation, the security industry and housing. Young individuals, usually in precarious employment, apply to intermediary companies to become temporary ‘guardians’ in metropolitan centres, most notably in London. The scheme allows guardians to pay below market rent to live in unusual locations while ‘performing’ live‐in security arrangements that are not considered as a form of ‘work’. The experiences of becoming and living as a property guardian can be ambivalent and contradictory: guardians express economic and social advantages to being temporary, while also exposing underlying anxieties with ‘flexible living’. In this paper we offer a detailed description of the various practices of property guardianship and how they must be understood, on the one hand, in light of recent geographical scholarship on housing insecurity and, on the other hand, as an example of a precarious subjectivity that has become normalised in recent decades in cities of the global North. Drawing on in‐depth interviews with long‐term property guardians in London, we unpack the narratives and rationales of university‐educated and highly skilled individuals for whom the city is a site of intensified insecurity and flexible negotiation. In the end, we conclude that the form of permanent temporariness experienced by property guardians needs to be understood as a symptom of wider dynamics of work and life precarisation in urban centres and argue that it is imperative to extend recent geographical debates around work and life insecurity to include new housing practices and their role in co‐constituting urban precarity.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:59:28Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:61949716-8bee-4534-a752-a6c5f123f621
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:59:28Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:61949716-8bee-4534-a752-a6c5f123f6212022-03-26T18:00:55ZLiving precariously: property guardianship and the flexible cityJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:61949716-8bee-4534-a752-a6c5f123f621Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Ferreri, MDawson, GVasudevan, AIn this paper we examine the precarious everyday geographies of property guardianship in the United Kingdom. Temporary property guardianship is a relatively new form of insecure urban dwelling existing in the grey area between informal occupation, the security industry and housing. Young individuals, usually in precarious employment, apply to intermediary companies to become temporary ‘guardians’ in metropolitan centres, most notably in London. The scheme allows guardians to pay below market rent to live in unusual locations while ‘performing’ live‐in security arrangements that are not considered as a form of ‘work’. The experiences of becoming and living as a property guardian can be ambivalent and contradictory: guardians express economic and social advantages to being temporary, while also exposing underlying anxieties with ‘flexible living’. In this paper we offer a detailed description of the various practices of property guardianship and how they must be understood, on the one hand, in light of recent geographical scholarship on housing insecurity and, on the other hand, as an example of a precarious subjectivity that has become normalised in recent decades in cities of the global North. Drawing on in‐depth interviews with long‐term property guardians in London, we unpack the narratives and rationales of university‐educated and highly skilled individuals for whom the city is a site of intensified insecurity and flexible negotiation. In the end, we conclude that the form of permanent temporariness experienced by property guardians needs to be understood as a symptom of wider dynamics of work and life precarisation in urban centres and argue that it is imperative to extend recent geographical debates around work and life insecurity to include new housing practices and their role in co‐constituting urban precarity.
spellingShingle Ferreri, M
Dawson, G
Vasudevan, A
Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city
title Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city
title_full Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city
title_fullStr Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city
title_full_unstemmed Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city
title_short Living precariously: property guardianship and the flexible city
title_sort living precariously property guardianship and the flexible city
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrerim livingprecariouslypropertyguardianshipandtheflexiblecity
AT dawsong livingprecariouslypropertyguardianshipandtheflexiblecity
AT vasudevana livingprecariouslypropertyguardianshipandtheflexiblecity