The effectiveness of blood metal ions in identifying patients with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris: An external multi-centre validation study

The effectiveness of blood metal ions in identifying patients with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris: An external multi-centre validation study

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Matharu, G, Berryman, F, Judge, A, Reito, A, McConnell, J, Lainiala, O, Young, S, Eskelinen, A, Pandit, H, Murray, D
Format:	Conference item
Published:	British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2018

Similar Items

Blood metal ion thresholds to identify patients with metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris: An external multicenter validation study of Birmingham hip resurfacing and corail-pinnacle implants
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

The effectiveness of blood metal ions in identifying patients with unilateral Birmingham hip resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip implants at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris.
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2015)

Can blood metal ion levels be used to identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacings who are at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris: A clinical update
by: Gulraj S Matharu, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Patient and radiographic factors help to predict metal-on-metal hip resurfacings with evidence of a pseudotumor
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.
by: Aleksi Reito, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings--a radiological perspective.
by: Chen, Z, et al.
Published: (2011)

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings-a radiological perspective
by: Chen, Z, et al.
Published: (2010)

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings--a radiological perspective.
by: Chen, Z, et al.
Published: (2011)

Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip replacement system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris?
by: Matharu, GS, et al.
Published: (2017)

Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.
by: Pandit, H, et al.
Published: (2008)

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?: A clinical update
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

What is the natural history of asymptomatic pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: America, where are you?
by: McLardy-Smith, P, et al.
Published: (2006)

No threshold exists for recommending revision surgery in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients with adverse reactions to metal debris: a retrospective cohort study of 346 revisions
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2019)

Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

Has the threshold for revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris changed in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? A cohort study using an adapted risk stratification algorithm
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2019)

Poor survivorship and frequent complications at a median of 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revision
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2016)

Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties.
by: Mahendra, G, et al.
Published: (2009)

What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?: A clinical update
by: Gulraj S Matharu, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Predicting high blood metal ion concentrations following hip resurfacing.
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2015)

Asymmetrical hip loading correlates with metal ion levels in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing during sit-to-stand.
by: Mellon, S, et al.
Published: (2014)

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of periprosthetic biological reactions.
by: Mabilleau, G, et al.
Published: (2008)

How should we follow-up asymptomatic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients? A prospective longitudinal cohort study
by: Low, A, et al.
Published: (2015)

Outcomes following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris in non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients: analysis of 185 revisions from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2017)

Follow-up for patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements: are the new MHRA recommendations justified?
by: Matharu, G, et al.
Published: (2018)

Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
by: Newman, M, et al.
Published: (2008)

"Asymptomatic" Pseudotumors After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
by: Kwon, Y, et al.
Published: (2011)

Implant failure in bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties: A clinical and pathological study
by: Uchihara, Y, et al.
Published: (2018)

Characterization of metal-wear nanoparticles in pseudotumor following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
by: Xia, Z, et al.
Published: (2011)

Characterization of metal-wear nanoparticles in pseudotumor following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
by: Xia, Z, et al.
Published: (2011)

Pseudotumours following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
by: Kwon, Y, et al.
Published: (2009)

Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
by: Kwon, Y, et al.
Published: (2010)

Metal-on-metal hips: current status
by: Ansari, J, et al.
Published: (2017)