Utilitarianism for animals, Kantianism for people? Harming animals and humans for the greater good
Most people hold that it is wrong to sacrifice some humans to save a greater number of humans. Do people also think that it is wrong to sacrifice some animals to save a greater number of animals, or do they answer such questions about harm to animals by engaging in a utilitarian cost-benefit calcula...
Hoofdauteurs: | Caviola, L, Kahane, G, Everett, J, Teperman, E, Savulescu, J, Faber, NS |
---|---|
Formaat: | Journal article |
Taal: | English |
Gepubliceerd in: |
American Psychological Association
2020
|
Gelijkaardige items
-
Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
door: Kahane, G, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2018) -
Beyond sacrificial harm: a two dimensional model of utilitarian decision-making
door: Kahane, G, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2017) -
'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.
door: Kahane, G, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2014) -
Humans first: why people value animals less than humans
door: Caviola, L, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022) -
From universal prescriptive to Kantian utilitarianism
door: Dobrijević Aleksandar T.
Gepubliceerd in: (2004-01-01)