Deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction

This chapter focuses on two areas where discussion of various kinds of indeterminacy has been commonplace: physics and fiction. It proposes a new model for understanding indeterminacy across these domains and argues that it has some notable advantages when compared to earlier accounts. Treating phys...

Popoln opis

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors: Darby, G, Pickup, M, Robson, J
Drugi avtorji: Bueno, O
Format: Book section
Izdano: Routledge 2017
_version_ 1826280346012876800
author Darby, G
Pickup, M
Robson, J
author2 Bueno, O
author_facet Bueno, O
Darby, G
Pickup, M
Robson, J
author_sort Darby, G
collection OXFORD
description This chapter focuses on two areas where discussion of various kinds of indeterminacy has been commonplace: physics and fiction. It proposes a new model for understanding indeterminacy across these domains and argues that it has some notable advantages when compared to earlier accounts. Treating physics and fiction cases univocally also indicates an interesting connection between indeterminacy in these two areas. Metaphysical indeterminacy is indeterminacy that is non-representational. The most prominent kind of fictional indeterminacy involves a fairly straightforward kind of fictional incompleteness. Lewis's account of fictional truth also seems very well-placed to deal with certain kinds of fictional indeterminacy. There are versions of both metaphysical and fictional indeterminacy that are particularly resistant to domestication. Deep fictional indeterminacy is indeterminacy in fiction where the structure of the fiction itself is the source of the indeterminacy. The Barnes-Williams (BW) model therefore treats metaphysical indeterminacy in much the way that supervaluationists treat representational indeterminacy.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:12:20Z
format Book section
id oxford-uuid:79a8b614-a7f0-4ea4-a8f0-889634665d49
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:12:20Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:79a8b614-a7f0-4ea4-a8f0-889634665d492022-03-26T20:38:47ZDeep indeterminacy in physics and fictionBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248uuid:79a8b614-a7f0-4ea4-a8f0-889634665d49Symplectic Elements at OxfordRoutledge2017Darby, GPickup, MRobson, JBueno, ODarby, GFrench, SRickles, DThis chapter focuses on two areas where discussion of various kinds of indeterminacy has been commonplace: physics and fiction. It proposes a new model for understanding indeterminacy across these domains and argues that it has some notable advantages when compared to earlier accounts. Treating physics and fiction cases univocally also indicates an interesting connection between indeterminacy in these two areas. Metaphysical indeterminacy is indeterminacy that is non-representational. The most prominent kind of fictional indeterminacy involves a fairly straightforward kind of fictional incompleteness. Lewis's account of fictional truth also seems very well-placed to deal with certain kinds of fictional indeterminacy. There are versions of both metaphysical and fictional indeterminacy that are particularly resistant to domestication. Deep fictional indeterminacy is indeterminacy in fiction where the structure of the fiction itself is the source of the indeterminacy. The Barnes-Williams (BW) model therefore treats metaphysical indeterminacy in much the way that supervaluationists treat representational indeterminacy.
spellingShingle Darby, G
Pickup, M
Robson, J
Deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction
title Deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction
title_full Deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction
title_fullStr Deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction
title_full_unstemmed Deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction
title_short Deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction
title_sort deep indeterminacy in physics and fiction
work_keys_str_mv AT darbyg deepindeterminacyinphysicsandfiction
AT pickupm deepindeterminacyinphysicsandfiction
AT robsonj deepindeterminacyinphysicsandfiction