Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
Background Adding, omitting or changing outcomes after a systematic review protocol is published can result in bias because it increases the potential for unacknowledged or post hoc revisions of the planned analyses. The main objective of this study was to look for discrepancies between primary outc...
Hlavní autoři: | Kirkham, J, Altman, D, Williamson, P |
---|---|
Médium: | Journal article |
Jazyk: | English |
Vydáno: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Podobné jednotky
-
Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process.
Autor: Jamie J Kirkham, a další
Vydáno: (2010-03-01) -
Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
Autor: Kirkham, J, a další
Vydáno: (2018) -
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
Autor: Kirkham, J, a další
Vydáno: (2010) -
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
Autor: Saini, P, a další
Vydáno: (2014) -
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
Autor: Kerry Dwan, a další
Vydáno: (2013-01-01)