Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?

It has been suggested that the quality of clinical trials should be assessed by blinded raters to limit the risk of introducing bias into meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and into the peer-review process. There is very little evidence in the literature to substantiate this. This study describes...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Jadad, A, Moore, R, Carroll, D, Jenkinson, C, Reynolds, D, Gavaghan, D, McQuay, H
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Elsevier 1996