Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology

<strong>Background<br></strong> Prognostic models are used widely in the oncology domain to guide medical decision-making. Little is known about the risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning and the barriers to their clinical uptake in the oncology domain....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Dhiman, P, Ma, J, Andaur Navarro, CL, Speich, B, Bullock, G, Damen, JAA, Hooft, L, Kirtley, S, Riley, RD, Van Calster, B, Moons, KGM, Collins, GS
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	BioMed Central 2022

Similar Items

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2022)

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2023)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2021)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
by: Paula Dhiman, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2021)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
by: Paula Dhiman, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2022)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2023)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2022)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
by: Levis, B, et al.
Published: (2023)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
by: Collins, GS, et al.
Published: (2021)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
by: Snell, KIE, et al.
Published: (2023)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
by: Debray, TPA, et al.
Published: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
by: Debray, TPA, et al.
Published: (2023)

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning
by: Collins, GS, et al.
Published: (2023)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
by: Gary S Collins, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
by: Collins, GS, et al.
Published: (2024)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
by: Wolff, RF, et al.
Published: (2019)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
by: Nguyen, T-L, et al.
Published: (2020)

A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R2 from a reported C statistic (AUROC) to inform sample size calculations for developing a prediction model with a binary outcome
by: Riley, RD, et al.
Published: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
by: Heus, P, et al.
Published: (2020)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in oncology: a systematic review
by: Kempf, E, et al.
Published: (2018)

Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome
by: Whittle, R, et al.
Published: (2024)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
by: Gary S Collins, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
by: Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
by: Van Calster, B, et al.
Published: (2021)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
by: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, et al.
Published: (2020)

Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations
by: Schlussel, MM, et al.
Published: (2023)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2023)

A systematic review showed more consideration is needed when conducting nonrandomized studies of interventions.
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2019)

Overinterpretation and misreporting of prognostic factor studies in medical oncology
by: Kempf, E, et al.
Published: (2016)

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review
by: Ma, J, et al.
Published: (2023)

Regarding a nomogram to predict osteoradionecrosis in oral cancer after marginal mandibulectomy and radiotherapy
by: Collins, GS, et al.
Published: (2019)

Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018–2019
by: Logullo, P, et al.
Published: (2023)

A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
by: Riley, R, et al.
Published: (2019)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
by: Debray, T, et al.
Published: (2018)

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal
by: Wynants, L, et al.
Published: (2020)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression
by: Pate, A, et al.
Published: (2023)

Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
by: Riley, RD, et al.
Published: (2020)