Investigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control models

<p>Different interactional settings require multilingual speakers to switch from one language to another (i.e., to ‘codeswitch’) or to speak in one language only. This ability to alternate languages, or adhere to one language, involves a language control mechanism, a core element of Green’s (1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zantout, M
Other Authors: Murphy, V
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
_version_ 1797108107389698048
author Zantout, M
author2 Murphy, V
author_facet Murphy, V
Zantout, M
author_sort Zantout, M
collection OXFORD
description <p>Different interactional settings require multilingual speakers to switch from one language to another (i.e., to ‘codeswitch’) or to speak in one language only. This ability to alternate languages, or adhere to one language, involves a language control mechanism, a core element of Green’s (1998) Inhibitory Control Model (ICM) which proposes to explain how bilinguals regulate control of their language systems. Recently, Green and colleagues (Green &amp; Abutalebi, 2013; Green &amp; Li, 2014; Green, 2018) have extended this model by putting forth the Adaptive Control Hypothesis (ACH) and the Control Process Model (CPM) which take into account external and internal variables, such as language proficiency and code-switching habits, which may influence language choice. While the ICM has been generally supported, the ACH and CPM have not been extensively investigated. The present study explores the application of the aforementioned models and hypothesis in a multilingual context by examining balanced and unbalanced multilingual speakers as they switch between three languages. It also examines how language proficiency, self-reported code-switching behaviour, and other individual differences influence cognitive and code-switching task performance. Another aim of the project is to assess whether having a high proficiency in a third language confers additional cognitive and/or linguistic benefits. Sixty adolescent participants (aged 17-18), 30 French-immersion students and 30 English-immersion students, were recruited in Lebanon, a multilingual country where French-English-Arabic code-switching is ubiquitous, to perform cognitive and linguistic tasks. A Flanker task, the arrow Simon task, and a backward digit-span task were also administered to examine conflict monitoring, inhibitory control, and working memory, as well as possible correlations between cognitive and linguistic task performance. Participants also performed a picture-naming task and a narration task which allowed the examination of switch costs and fluency, respectively. It was predicted that the French-immersion participants, given their frequent trilingual code-switching and higher proficiency level in their third language, would outperform their English-immersion counterparts, whose use of French is minimal, in both domain-general and linguistic tasks. Results, however, indicated that the two groups performed similarly in cognitive tasks. However, on the linguistic tasks, French-immersion (more balanced) participants exhibited different patterns from their English-immersion counterparts (who were less balanced) on several conditions of the trilingual picture-naming task and on the narration task in the single-language condition. Switch costs differed across the three languages for both groups, with the strongest language(s) requiring increased inhibition, thus lending support to the ICM and CPM. Language experience, including frequency of code-switching and salient-cue detection, was also highly correlated with performance on both linguistic and cognitive tasks, therefore lending support for the ACH. Implications of the role of the third language are discussed in terms of the types of tasks employed in this study, and discussions of the concept of language proficiency and habitual code-switching experiences vis-à-vis the control processes in both models are offered.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:24:34Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:803b0705-be39-457a-b023-c3f49ad79473
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:24:34Z
publishDate 2019
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:803b0705-be39-457a-b023-c3f49ad794732022-11-10T12:01:05ZInvestigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control modelsThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:803b0705-be39-457a-b023-c3f49ad79473cognitive tasksInhibitory Control Modelswitch costsAdaptive Control HypothesisSimon taskteenagersFrenchControl Process ModelNarration taskFlanker taskpsycholinguisticslanguage control modelslanguage switchingcode-switchingbilingualismArabicyoung adultsLebanonEnglishmultilingualismlanguage proficiencyEnglishORA Deposit2019Zantout, MMurphy, VWei, L<p>Different interactional settings require multilingual speakers to switch from one language to another (i.e., to ‘codeswitch’) or to speak in one language only. This ability to alternate languages, or adhere to one language, involves a language control mechanism, a core element of Green’s (1998) Inhibitory Control Model (ICM) which proposes to explain how bilinguals regulate control of their language systems. Recently, Green and colleagues (Green &amp; Abutalebi, 2013; Green &amp; Li, 2014; Green, 2018) have extended this model by putting forth the Adaptive Control Hypothesis (ACH) and the Control Process Model (CPM) which take into account external and internal variables, such as language proficiency and code-switching habits, which may influence language choice. While the ICM has been generally supported, the ACH and CPM have not been extensively investigated. The present study explores the application of the aforementioned models and hypothesis in a multilingual context by examining balanced and unbalanced multilingual speakers as they switch between three languages. It also examines how language proficiency, self-reported code-switching behaviour, and other individual differences influence cognitive and code-switching task performance. Another aim of the project is to assess whether having a high proficiency in a third language confers additional cognitive and/or linguistic benefits. Sixty adolescent participants (aged 17-18), 30 French-immersion students and 30 English-immersion students, were recruited in Lebanon, a multilingual country where French-English-Arabic code-switching is ubiquitous, to perform cognitive and linguistic tasks. A Flanker task, the arrow Simon task, and a backward digit-span task were also administered to examine conflict monitoring, inhibitory control, and working memory, as well as possible correlations between cognitive and linguistic task performance. Participants also performed a picture-naming task and a narration task which allowed the examination of switch costs and fluency, respectively. It was predicted that the French-immersion participants, given their frequent trilingual code-switching and higher proficiency level in their third language, would outperform their English-immersion counterparts, whose use of French is minimal, in both domain-general and linguistic tasks. Results, however, indicated that the two groups performed similarly in cognitive tasks. However, on the linguistic tasks, French-immersion (more balanced) participants exhibited different patterns from their English-immersion counterparts (who were less balanced) on several conditions of the trilingual picture-naming task and on the narration task in the single-language condition. Switch costs differed across the three languages for both groups, with the strongest language(s) requiring increased inhibition, thus lending support to the ICM and CPM. Language experience, including frequency of code-switching and salient-cue detection, was also highly correlated with performance on both linguistic and cognitive tasks, therefore lending support for the ACH. Implications of the role of the third language are discussed in terms of the types of tasks employed in this study, and discussions of the concept of language proficiency and habitual code-switching experiences vis-à-vis the control processes in both models are offered.</p>
spellingShingle cognitive tasks
Inhibitory Control Model
switch costs
Adaptive Control Hypothesis
Simon task
teenagers
French
Control Process Model
Narration task
Flanker task
psycholinguistics
language control models
language switching
code-switching
bilingualism
Arabic
young adults
Lebanon
English
multilingualism
language proficiency
Zantout, M
Investigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control models
title Investigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control models
title_full Investigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control models
title_fullStr Investigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control models
title_full_unstemmed Investigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control models
title_short Investigating multilingual adolescents’ cognitive and codeswitching performance: an exploratory application of language control models
title_sort investigating multilingual adolescents cognitive and codeswitching performance an exploratory application of language control models
topic cognitive tasks
Inhibitory Control Model
switch costs
Adaptive Control Hypothesis
Simon task
teenagers
French
Control Process Model
Narration task
Flanker task
psycholinguistics
language control models
language switching
code-switching
bilingualism
Arabic
young adults
Lebanon
English
multilingualism
language proficiency
work_keys_str_mv AT zantoutm investigatingmultilingualadolescentscognitiveandcodeswitchingperformanceanexploratoryapplicationoflanguagecontrolmodels