The bureaucratic court? Administrative justice and the admissibility decision-making of the European Court of Human Rights
<p>How should the European Court of Human Rights “decide what cases to decide”? This thesis examines the procedural justice of the admissibility decision-making of the Strasbourg court. Reappraising the “individual vs constitutional” debate which continues to dominate the Convention literature...
Päätekijä: | Tickell, AS |
---|---|
Aineistotyyppi: | Opinnäyte |
Kieli: | English |
Julkaistu: |
2017
|
Aiheet: |
Samankaltaisia teoksia
-
A Summary: Portraying the Legal Culture and the European Human Rights Culture of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice through Interviews
Tekijä: Nina-Louisa Arold Lorenz
Julkaistu: (2021-11-01) -
A Summary: Portraying the Legal Culture and the European Human Rights Culture of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice through Interviews
Tekijä: Nina-Louisa Arold Lorenz
Julkaistu: (2021-11-01) -
Fundamental Rights in Europe: “Constitutional” Dialogue between the Court of Justice of the EU and European Court of Human Rights
Tekijä: Sonia Morano-Foadi
Julkaistu: (2015-04-01) -
Is the European Court of Human Rights satisfied with the Russian criminal justice system?
Tekijä: Voskobitova, Maria R.
Julkaistu: (2007) -
the right to GOOD ADMINISTRATION IN THE Court of Justice of the EUROPEAN Union CASE LAW
Tekijä: Elisabeta SLABU
Julkaistu: (2017-06-01)