Disenfranchisement of convicted adult citizens: comparative and international human rights perspectives
<p>This thesis analyses the appropriateness of disenfranchising convicted adult citizens from comparative and international human rights perspectives.</p> <p>Chapter One explores the transition from direct democracy to representative government, and the subsequent increased importa...
Päätekijä: | Ziegler, R |
---|---|
Muut tekijät: | McCrudden, C |
Aineistotyyppi: | Opinnäyte |
Kieli: | English |
Julkaistu: |
2009
|
Aiheet: |
Samankaltaisia teoksia
-
An investigation of clemency and pardons in death penalty cases in Southeast Asia from 1975-2009
Tekijä: Pascoe, D, et al.
Julkaistu: (2013) -
Assessing proportionality in capital cases: a case study of Ohio
Tekijä: Berry III, WW
Julkaistu: (2011) -
Fatal distraction: does the Texas capital sentencing statute discourage the consideration of mitigating evidence?
Tekijä: Vartkessian, E
Julkaistu: (2011) -
Remorse and retribution: justifying mitigation at sentencing
Tekijä: Maslen, H, et al.
Julkaistu: (2011) -
The Statist Penalization in the Light of a State-Oriented-Research Approach in Contemporary Iran
Tekijä: Mehrdad Rayejian Asli
Julkaistu: (2022-08-01)