[18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imaging

Purpose Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are extensively studied and used as anti-cancer drugs, as single agents or in combination with other therapies. Most radiotracers developed to date have been chosen on the basis of strong PARP1-3 affinity. Herein, we propose to study AZD2461, a P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guibbal, F, Hopkins, S, Pacelli, A, Isenegger, PG, Mosley, M, Torres, J, Dias, GM, Mahaut, D, Hueting, R, Gouverneur, V, Cornelissen, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer Verlag 2020
_version_ 1797081664616136704
author Guibbal, F
Hopkins, S
Pacelli, A
Isenegger, PG
Mosley, M
Torres, J
Dias, GM
Mahaut, D
Hueting, R
Gouverneur, V
Cornelissen, B
author_facet Guibbal, F
Hopkins, S
Pacelli, A
Isenegger, PG
Mosley, M
Torres, J
Dias, GM
Mahaut, D
Hueting, R
Gouverneur, V
Cornelissen, B
author_sort Guibbal, F
collection OXFORD
description Purpose Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are extensively studied and used as anti-cancer drugs, as single agents or in combination with other therapies. Most radiotracers developed to date have been chosen on the basis of strong PARP1-3 affinity. Herein, we propose to study AZD2461, a PARP inhibitor with lower affinity towards PARP3 and to investigate its potential for PARP targeting in vivo . Procedures Using the Cu-mediated 18 F-fluorodeboronation of a carefully designed radiolabelling precursor, we accessed the 18 F-labeled isotopologue of the PARP inhibitor AZD2461. Cell uptake of [ 18 F]AZD2461 in vitro was assessed in a range of pancreatic cell lines (PSN-1, PANC-1, CFPAC-1 and AsPC-1) to assess PARP expression, and in vivo in xenograft-bearing mice. Blocking experiments were performed with both olaparib and AZD2461. Results [ 18 F]AZD2461 was efficiently radiolabelled via both manual and automated procedures (9% ± 3% and 3% ± 1% Activity yields non-decay corrected). [ 18 F]AZD2461 was taken up in vivo in PARP1-expressing tumours and the highest uptake was observed for PSN-1 cells (7.34 ± 1.16%ID/g). In vitro blocking experiments showed a lesser ability of olaparib to reduce [ 18 F]AZD2461 binding, indicating a difference in selectivity between olaparib and AZD2461. Conclusion Taken together, we show the importance of screening the PARP selectivity profile of radiolabelled PARP inhibitors for use as PET imaging agents.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T01:17:17Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8f201508-7cae-4816-8599-3838ce7aeb4c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T01:17:17Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Verlag
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8f201508-7cae-4816-8599-3838ce7aeb4c2022-03-26T23:02:20Z[18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imagingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8f201508-7cae-4816-8599-3838ce7aeb4cEnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer Verlag2020Guibbal, FHopkins, SPacelli, AIsenegger, PGMosley, MTorres, JDias, GMMahaut, DHueting, RGouverneur, VCornelissen, BPurpose Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are extensively studied and used as anti-cancer drugs, as single agents or in combination with other therapies. Most radiotracers developed to date have been chosen on the basis of strong PARP1-3 affinity. Herein, we propose to study AZD2461, a PARP inhibitor with lower affinity towards PARP3 and to investigate its potential for PARP targeting in vivo . Procedures Using the Cu-mediated 18 F-fluorodeboronation of a carefully designed radiolabelling precursor, we accessed the 18 F-labeled isotopologue of the PARP inhibitor AZD2461. Cell uptake of [ 18 F]AZD2461 in vitro was assessed in a range of pancreatic cell lines (PSN-1, PANC-1, CFPAC-1 and AsPC-1) to assess PARP expression, and in vivo in xenograft-bearing mice. Blocking experiments were performed with both olaparib and AZD2461. Results [ 18 F]AZD2461 was efficiently radiolabelled via both manual and automated procedures (9% ± 3% and 3% ± 1% Activity yields non-decay corrected). [ 18 F]AZD2461 was taken up in vivo in PARP1-expressing tumours and the highest uptake was observed for PSN-1 cells (7.34 ± 1.16%ID/g). In vitro blocking experiments showed a lesser ability of olaparib to reduce [ 18 F]AZD2461 binding, indicating a difference in selectivity between olaparib and AZD2461. Conclusion Taken together, we show the importance of screening the PARP selectivity profile of radiolabelled PARP inhibitors for use as PET imaging agents.
spellingShingle Guibbal, F
Hopkins, S
Pacelli, A
Isenegger, PG
Mosley, M
Torres, J
Dias, GM
Mahaut, D
Hueting, R
Gouverneur, V
Cornelissen, B
[18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imaging
title [18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imaging
title_full [18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imaging
title_fullStr [18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imaging
title_full_unstemmed [18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imaging
title_short [18F]AZD2461, an insight on difference in PARP binding profiles for DNA damage response PET imaging
title_sort 18f azd2461 an insight on difference in parp binding profiles for dna damage response pet imaging
work_keys_str_mv AT guibbalf 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT hopkinss 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT pacellia 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT iseneggerpg 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT mosleym 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT torresj 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT diasgm 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT mahautd 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT huetingr 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT gouverneurv 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging
AT cornelissenb 18fazd2461aninsightondifferenceinparpbindingprofilesfordnadamageresponsepetimaging