‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
第一著者: | Dore-Horgan, E |
---|---|
フォーマット: | Journal article |
言語: | English |
出版事項: |
Wiley
2022
|
類似資料
-
The expressivist objection to nonconsensual neurocorrectives
著者:: De Marco, G, 等
出版事項: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
著者:: De Marco, G
出版事項: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
著者:: Douglas, T
出版事項: (2016) -
Neurocorrection: an offender-oriented defence
著者:: Dore-Horgan, E
出版事項: (2022) -
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
著者:: Savulescu, J
出版事項: (2001)