Appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger
Forty-eight undergraduate students completed diaries reporting on up to five episodes of anger experienced over the course of a week. Ratings of motivational relevance, motivational incongruence and other-accountability appraisals were significantly lower for relatively less reasonable instances of...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference item |
| Published: |
2009
|
| _version_ | 1797084311544922112 |
|---|---|
| author | Parkinson, B Roper, A Simons, G |
| author_facet | Parkinson, B Roper, A Simons, G |
| author_sort | Parkinson, B |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Forty-eight undergraduate students completed diaries reporting on up to five episodes of anger experienced over the course of a week. Ratings of motivational relevance, motivational incongruence and other-accountability appraisals were significantly lower for relatively less reasonable instances of anger. Multilevel modelling confirmed that rated reasonableness of anger was a significant continuous predictor of the same three appraisal dimensions, even after controlling for reported anger. These results extend earlier findings obtained using retrospective questionnaires, suggesting that reportable other-blame-related appraisals are generally weaker when anger is perceived as unreasonable. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:53:43Z |
| format | Conference item |
| id | oxford-uuid:9b033743-cecf-4f87-986c-00d173783014 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T01:53:43Z |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:9b033743-cecf-4f87-986c-00d1737830142022-03-27T00:25:30ZAppraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable angerConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:9b033743-cecf-4f87-986c-00d173783014Symplectic Elements at Oxford2009Parkinson, BRoper, ASimons, GForty-eight undergraduate students completed diaries reporting on up to five episodes of anger experienced over the course of a week. Ratings of motivational relevance, motivational incongruence and other-accountability appraisals were significantly lower for relatively less reasonable instances of anger. Multilevel modelling confirmed that rated reasonableness of anger was a significant continuous predictor of the same three appraisal dimensions, even after controlling for reported anger. These results extend earlier findings obtained using retrospective questionnaires, suggesting that reportable other-blame-related appraisals are generally weaker when anger is perceived as unreasonable. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. |
| spellingShingle | Parkinson, B Roper, A Simons, G Appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger |
| title | Appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger |
| title_full | Appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger |
| title_fullStr | Appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger |
| title_full_unstemmed | Appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger |
| title_short | Appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger |
| title_sort | appraisal ratings in diary reports of reasonable and unreasonable anger |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT parkinsonb appraisalratingsindiaryreportsofreasonableandunreasonableanger AT ropera appraisalratingsindiaryreportsofreasonableandunreasonableanger AT simonsg appraisalratingsindiaryreportsofreasonableandunreasonableanger |